Governor's attitude is inspired by Governor's attitude, the victory of Constitution: Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivededi

New -delhi, April 12 (IANS). The Supreme Court eventually intercepted the long -standing bill between the Tamil Nadu government and governor RN Ravi. After the historical decision of the court, the ten bills, which were stopped by the governor from the year 2020, have now automatically become the law. The Supreme Court called the Governor’s behavior against the Constitution and a violation of Article 200. In this case, senior lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi, who advocated on behalf of the Tamil Nadu government, provided detailed information on this entire development and the decision of the Supreme Court in a special discussion with Ians. He said this decision was made under the special circumstances of Tamil Nadu. The situation was that the ten bills were adopted by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and sent to the Governor for their approval, but the Governor printed him for more than a year and made no decision. Meanwhile, a case related to Punjab came to the Supreme Court and the court gave a clear decision on Article 200. The court said that if a bill comes to the governor and does not want to approve it, they must first return them to the legislature, with a message for reconsideration. If the legislature reproduces the bill and sends it, it will be compulsory for the governor to approve it. His conscience has no role there, it was decided. Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi further said that the case of Tamil Nadu was also pending in the Supreme Court. When the hearing began this, the Attorney General suggested that the case be tried to resolve the case with the governor. However, the governor did not approve at that time, nor sent the president, but returned all the accounts by writing “I do not give his consent”. After this, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly passed him back and sent him back to the governor, and he sent him to the president. Rakesh Dwivedi said: “It seems that the intention of the governor was not good. To keep the files for a year, then to ignore the decision of the Punjab case and to stop all the bills without any intelligence, shows everything they worked badly. The Governor cannot say that I will stop or send it to the president. of Article 200 and canceled it. Because when the foundation has fallen, the rest of the structure becomes illegal on its own. Explain that the Tamil Nadu government approved a total of 10 bills in the meeting, some of which were adopted during the tenure of the AIDMK government, while the rest was passed during the DMK government. But Governor RN Ravi did not approve of these bills and stopped for a long time without any decision. After this, the current government again passed on all these bills in the meeting and sent them to the governor, but he did not agree this time and sent him to the president for consideration. The government described the process as unfair and unconstitutional and knocked on the door of the Supreme Court, after which the peak court made clear that such behavior of the governor contradicts Article 200 of the Constitution and the prevention or postponement of the approved bill of the legislature is not in line with the role of the Governor. -Ians PSM/CBT