Despite the approval of SC, the Supreme Court is not interested in appointing AD Hawk judges, no proposal has been sent to June 11 -Supreme Court is reluctant to appoint ad hoc judges despite approval of the Supreme Court

Even after the Supreme Court’s approval, the Supreme Court does not show interest in the appointment of ad hoc to resolve pending criminal cases. No one sent a proposal to the Ministry of Rights until June 11. The Supreme Court gave permission to appoint ad hoc judges in light of more than 18 lakh pending cases, but with some conditions. Pti, New -Delhi. Despite being approved by the Supreme Court about five months ago, different courts do not look at the appointment of AD HOC (Ed Hawk) judges to act in anticipation of criminal cases. This information was received from the available details with the central government. According to people who are aware of the appointment process of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court judges, no Supreme Court Collegium has not recommended the names of retired judges to be appointed as ad hoc judges. No Supreme Court has sent proposals, there are 25 Supreme Courts in the country, but until June 11, no collegium in the Supreme Court sent such a proposal to the Ministry of Rights. The Supreme Court allowed the Supreme Court to appoint ad hoc judges on January 30 in the light of more than 18 lakh pending criminal cases, provided their number does not exceed 10 percent of the total judges approved for the court. Article-224A of the Constitution allows retired judges to be appointed as ad hoc judges to assist in dealing with pending cases. According to the procedure, the college of the Supreme Court concerned sends the names or recommendations of the candidates to be appointed judge of the Supreme Court to the Department of Justice of the Ministry of Rights. The Supreme Court is taking on the collegium. After this, the Justice Department adds information and details of the candidates and then sends it to the Supreme Court Collegium. The Supreme Court then makes a final decision and recommends the government appoint selected persons as judges. The president signs the ‘warrant for appointment’ of the newly appointed judge. The appointment process of ad hoc judges will also remain the same, except that the president will not sign the letter of appointment. But the president’s consent will be taken for the appointment of ad hoc judges. What conditions did the court impose? Officials said earlier that there is no example of the appointment of retired judges as ad hoc judges except a case. The Pillion Court imposed some conditions in the ruling given on April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court. Later, however, the special bank of the then Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Justice Br Gavai (current Chief Justice) and Justice Suryakanth expanded and postponed some conditions. The retired Supreme Court judges for two to three years of retirement judges to resolve the pending matters in the ruling written by former Chief Justice SA Bobde. Instructions were given to appoint. What did the Supreme Court say? One condition said that if the Supreme Court works with 80 percent of its approved posts, ad hoc judges cannot be appointed, while the second condition said that ad hoc judges can put in different banks to deal with cases. The beam also said that each Supreme Court should appoint two to five ad hoc judges and that this number should not be more than 10 percent of the total approved posts.