Priya Kapoor received relief from the Delhi High Court in the controversy of Sanjay Kapoor, was allowed, was allowed - the Supreme Court in NCR Delhi accepted Priya Kapoors in Sanjay Kapoor property

Priya Kapoor received relief from the Delhi High Court in Sanjay Kapoor property dispute, appropriately updated: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 11:14 (IST) High Court in Delhi accepted the Priya Kapoor’s petition in the case related to the property of the late National Sanjay Kapoor. Priya demanded that her sister Mandira Kapoor’s presence be removed. Senior lawyer Rajiv Nair gave arguments on behalf of Priya and her son. The case is related to the will of Sanjay Kapoor of about 30 thousand crore calls. The Supreme Court accepted the application of Priya Kapoor related to the removal of the sister’s name. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. The Delhi High Court accepted the application filed by Priya Kapoor in action related to the will of about 30 thousand crore calls by the late industrial Sanjay Kapoor. During the hearing, senior lawyer Rajiv Nair, who appeared on behalf of Priya, filed an application on behalf of Priya and her minor son. It demanded that the presence of Priya’s sister Mandira Kapoor be removed by September 10. Remove the ad, just read the news. He said it was an attempt by Mandeera to join the back door. The application claims that the presence of a lawyer incorrectly reflects on behalf of Mandeera, while he is not a party in the current proceedings. The court accepted the application of Priya Kapoor after hearing the arguments. Priya Kapoor filed an application on a petition submitted by two children of Sanjay Kapoor’s ex -wife and actress Karishma Kapoor, demanding the share in the property. The court ordered Priya on September 10 to offer all its moving and immovable properties until the date of death of Sanjay Kapoor on June 12. Karishma and Sanjay were married in 2003, but were divorced in 2016. Sanjay Kapoor died on June 12 during a Polo match in London. Apart from Karishma’s children, Sanjay Kapoor’s mother also challenged the will.