This girl learns such lessons for men sitting in public places

You should have seen regularly that some men in public places like bus, subway or exercise in such a way that both their legs are randomly distributed. This act is called ‘men’s preaching’ in English. It not only creates discomfort for others, but also becomes some kind of genitalize, especially when women or the elderly try to sit near them. Voices of protests gradually arise around the world against this tendency. But the method adopted by a Russian woman to stop it remains not only the topic of discussion, but also goes viral on the internet. Who is Anna Dovagaliuk? Anna Dovgalyuk is a 20 -year -old student of St. Petersburg, Russia and an active social activist. Anna is known for having an open vote against women’s rights and gender discrimination. He has drawn such a way against men who are just as effective in public transport, which is just as shocking. Unique protest against Manospreaching Anna is of the opinion that sitting in public transport by men is not only the place, but the exceeding of others’ privacy and comfort. She says that this tendency reflects the mentality of men in which they consider themselves over others in public places. On the other hand, she started a video project in which she puts a special mix on such men. This mixture contains 30 liters of water and 6 liters of bleach. He claims that this bleach is 30 times more powerful than normal domestic use. Protest or attack? She places this bleach that Anna uses directly on the thighs of the men, that is, the Groons area. Their purpose is clear – to embarrass them and give them a message that such activities have no place in society. According to him, it is a symbolic action for every person who has ever felt insulted in public places because of the appearance of masculinity. Anna says: “This video is devoted to all men who think it is their right to sit by spreading legs. I want people to understand which body part of men operates.” His remarks may be uncomfortable for many, but their goal is to attack the gender thoughts that prevail in society. This is not the first time Anna has come out on a social matter in a controversial way. Earlier, he also adopted another method in protest against the incidents of raising skirt in Russia. At the time, he protested by lifting his skirt in the subway so that people could understand how uncomfortable it could be to interfere in the privacy of women. However, controversy over the video also raised controversy about Anna’s video. Some Russian news agencies claim that this video is not real, but that a written act and the actors are included by paying money. But Anna completely rejects this claim. He says, “All my projects are real. I don’t believe in any kind of online stunt. It’s all true and there’s no script behind.” Legal aspects and answer are the question of people whether anyone complained to Anna’s actions? Anna says that no one has filed a police charge yet. In his words: “I don’t think anyone will go to the police if his jeans are spoiled. They know they made a mistake, and therefore they remain silent.” However, many legal experts see this with disagreement. He says that throwing chemicals on someone in a public place, even if it is bleach, can fall into the category of attack or harassment. This can have serious legal consequences. This campaign of Anna, who questions the thinking of society, again created a debate whether women should adopt similar ways to protest? And can such ways change the thinking of society? Some people appreciate Anna, but some people consider it a very reactionary and unacceptable way. But there is no doubt that they have long ignored the problem and brought them to the center of debate. Conclusions: Should you be uncomfortable for change? Although the opposition against Anna Dovagaliuk seems fierce and uncomfortable, its purpose is to draw attention to a serious but often ignored problem in society. Men’s preaching is not just a physical posture, but an expression of a mentality – in which men regard public places as their ‘jurisdiction’. If this uncomfortable protest makes society think, it was probably necessary. Because the change often starts from where people get the most shock.