Four points associated with the WAQF Act, whose ruling will be given to the Supreme Court

WAQF ACT: The four points associated with the new WAQF Act, whose test will last deliver its verdict: April 18, 2025, 23:31 IST Supreme Court on WAQF Act: Those who now disputed the new WAQF Act before the Supreme Court. Four important issues have emerged during the hearing so far. The challenge was given to the WAQF (Amendment Act, 2025 in the Supreme Court. The challenge given to the Supreme Court to the Highlights Waqf (Amendment Act, 2025. The requesters objected not to be in the new law of many provisions. 2025 of the road to the court. WAQF property change will be. But the attitude of the court was not completely calm. Let us tell you extensively about the same points that can be the basis of SC’s decision. Why does the controversy arise on the new WAQF Act? On April 16, a three -member bank, led by Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna, heard about 65 petitions filed against this Act. These petitions include All India Majlis-e -udehadul Muslimen (Aimim) MP Asaduddin Owaisi, TMC’s Mahua Moitra, RJD’s Manoj Jha, SPs Zia Ur Rehman, Congress’s Imran Masood and Mohammad Javed, former Mp Udit Raj, Maa Mahmud Madni of Darul Ulum Deoband, Maulana Mahmud Madni of Darul Ulum Deoband, Maulana Mahmud Madni of Darul Ulum Deoband, Maulana Maumad Madmud Madni of Darul Ulum Deoband, Maulana Maumand and CPI. What is the case of Article 26? Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal argued that this Act violates Article 26 of the Constitution. Article 26 gives each religious community the right to carry out its religious matters independently. These rights can only be limited to three conditions- a people’s system, morality and public health. 1. The most disputed point: WAQF by user WAQF by the user, the country that has long been used for religious or charities, even if it is not registered. In the new 2025 Act, it was eliminated for future offers. Now only these assets will be regarded as WAQF already registered. And if there is a dispute over the land or the government claims to be government land, it will not be considered a waqf. The government says the possession of the name WAQF has increased. Therefore, it became necessary to eliminate the system like WAQF by the user. But the court raised the question. The Chief Justice said: ‘If a land has been used for 300 years, how can you register it? What about right cases? ‘The requesters reminded that the Supreme Court also accepted the validity of the WAQF by the user in the 2019 Ayodhya ruling. 2.. In terms of the new law, the district collector receives the ‘tremendous’ power, if the collector says that a country is the government, then he immediately comes out of the waqf category, even if the case is pending in court. This is an important provision of Article 3 (c). This means that the status of WAQF can change land with the decision of an officer. The court said, it would also be considered a stay. 3. Why in the non-Muslim waqf board? Another big question was: Can non-Muslims be made members of the WAQF Council? The requesters said: ‘This is a direct violation of Article 26 (b), 26 (c) and 26 (d). Religious matters are the right of the community. There cannot be external intervention in it. The center made it clear that it would not affect the privileges of the community. But the court was not satisfied. CJI asked the sharp question: “Will you now include Muslims with Hindu religious trusts?” Attorney -General Tushar Mehta acknowledged that if a state does, his appointment should be considered to be canceled. 4.. Now the limitation of the limitation also applies? Another major change is that the 2025 Act applies the WAQF Property Restability Act. That is, if the country is occupied and a lot of time is over, legal claims will not be made. WAQF was exempt from the 1995 Act from the Limited Restriction Act. Meaning, possession can be removed at any time. Sibal said “it is against the protection of WAQF”. CJI said about this that “there are benefits of limiting the restriction, too” disadvantage “. What will happen next? The court refrained from giving interim relief. But indicated to stay on many streams. In the first place, the appointment of non-Muslims and the court’s attitude about the powers of the collector will be important. The next trial is on May 5. It may take time to get to the final decision of the Court on this Act. Location: New -delhi, Delhi First published: April 18, 2025, 22:57 IST HONREATION The four points associated with Waqf Law, the four points, whose test will get the verdict