"Oben ai" for artificial intelligence, a magazine

The content associated with the content concludes between artificial intelligence companies and the largest publishing houses quickly with enthusiasm. The latest agreement, which is allegedly the largest, was announced on May 22, where Openai’s “Openai” with Robert Murdoch, and reports indicate that its value is about $ 250 million over a 5 -year period. “The agreement confirms that there is a higher price for the leading press.” None of the terms of the transaction officially announced, but with the assumption that the Wall Street Journal will not publish false news about the “News Corp” owners will include the value of the $ 250 million transfer “an interview in the form of cash, and a balance of the use of technology. The previous week was announced, where the “financial times” were announced, where the “financial times” were announced. and human efforts, and in this case it will be linked to the difficult and expensive task of publishing the news. Most prominent of my attention, as one of the latest beneficiaries of the selective Tamman incerversation for the activities of the press, thinks that Drivos, without an agreement, would speak without an agreement without an agreement, but he said the newspaper “Wall Street” agreement, without an agreement (Obence AI), will use a more comprehensive and concentrated content without achieving any benefit. ‘Drivos is right, it is likely that’ oben ai ‘has long paid the content that currently pays paid in the framework of the widespread withdrawal process. From this point of view, these transactions must be seen as settlement agreements, and this undoubtedly includes that the items are not prosecuted the publishers of ‘Oben Ai’, as the New York Times did. A preliminary trial in a case of the majority that will eventually reach the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, publishing houses can accept or reject an agreement, knowing that the machine is more likely to consume its contents, regardless of that. Of course, ‘oben ai’ says it develops an instrument to help the role to give the role in reporting what you want to exclude from ‘Oben AI’ training models, but it is not ready to use at the best before 2025. ‘Oben Ai’ is also just one of the many companies that develop major linguistic models. I see that these transactions are bad as they have transparency and appropriate moral investigation at the same time. Whoever appreciates the importance of the fourth authority is the right of an estimate that should not accept a vision that the artificial intelligence companies, which in itself must be subject to press investigation, can become maximum control over the financial strength of a print media if other business models continue to collapse. If you want to see what it seems to be subordinate and subordinate, look at current concerns about the recent changes that Google has made on the search engine, or the decision of the “Mita platforms” to refrain to increase the news content more. In the long run, support of newspapers and small websites to enrich the content can be the most important problem that it is not in the hands of people such as Altman, or any individual or another undertaking, the decision to determine that any of the print media is not left in the future in the future, on the basis of artificial intelligence and which of it does not have adequate experience. What about small local newspapers or websites- from which little is left- that do less brilliant work, such as following up the meetings of local councils or educational councils? Or commercial magazines that publish more depth reports on sectors such as energy or engineering? Do we want artificial intelligence models that spread the wealth (content) through the independent print media? I don’t see Altman knocking on their doors full of money, although these newspapers and magazines are probably included in training data. If artificial intelligence will really become a focal point of knowledge, these sources should also be supported and not limited to the giant publishers who fear a Ai ” fear of suing it. A proposal to create a united content platform must be created a more fair system supported by law. On this, Courtney Radch, director of the Press and Freedom Center at the Institute of Open Markets, wrote: “Show transactions on demand and confidentiality with the greatest or most influential media are not alternative to public policy.” While the author and professor of journalism, Jeff Jarvis, suggested an approach to establish a central platform offered by a coalition of publishers. This allows the contents of any publishing house to be immediately and dynamically available for the artificial intelligence businesses in exchange for a fee determined by consumption or any other scale agreed upon. The Associated Press, founded 178 years ago, can in this case provide inspiration, the non -profit news agency established and funded by newspapers to resolve the technical challenges it faces during that period, which was the news of the Mexican US War faster to readers in the North. Although the problems of the present era are much more complicated, the beginning of the solution can be in a principle ratified in 1846, and is still true in our time; It is a contents of context that must control it.