'Chhattisgarh and the central government gave this order for rehabilitation of people affected by Naxalite, the Supreme Court gave this order - the duty of Chhattisgarh Govt Center to bring peace rehabilitation of Naxal -affected people

“Chhattisgarh and the central government have given the responsibility to rehabilitation of people influenced by Naxal,”, the Supreme Court said it was the responsibility of the Chhattisgarh government and the central government to take sufficient steps for the rehabilitation and peace of the residents of the state. The Pillow Court stopped 18 -year -old cases involved in the allegations of human rights violations by security forces and Salwa Judum activists in the state. ‘Chhattisgarh and the central government’s responsibility for rehabilitation of people affected by NAXAL, the Supreme Court (filing photo), New Delhi. The Supreme Court said it was the responsibility of the Chhattisgarh government and the central government to take sufficient steps for the rehabilitation and peace of the residents of the state affected by Naxal violence. The Apex Court said that the peak court was 18 years old involved in the allegations of human rights violations by security forces and Salwa Judum activists in the state. A Bench of Justice BV Nagratna and Justice Saatha Chandra Sharma, who had business of human rights violations, closed matters on human rights and other petitions by activist Nandini Sundar. It was accused of not following the 2011 order, in which the use of special police officers (SPOs) was banned in anti -Naxal operations in the state. The state and the central government must act in a coordinated way, and the bank said: “We find that in the light of the situation that arises in the state of Chhattisgarh, it is necessary to take concrete steps so that peace and rehabilitation can be brought to those areas.” The state and the central government must function in a coordinated way. “No law can be considered contempt of court- the Bank Court also said that no law made by Parliament or the Government Meeting can be regarded as contempt of court. The bank said that the leadership of the law is an expression of legislative work, there is no interference until it is against the Constitution.