It is not excluded to impose a ban on electric cars and solar panels

Perhaps the world technology makes an enemy in response to the split it suffers as a result of conflict between major powers and separation between economies and high enlargement and fear that the interest of capital will promote the interests of the workers. It can be taken into account that the best way to maintain the status quo is to destroy the mechanism to change the existing methods. It was the thinking of the ‘ovarian movement’, which the textile workers began in England at the beginning of the nineteenth century. In light of the frustration as a result of the commercial embargo and the financial crisis as a result of the Napoleon wars, these workers have destroyed the loyalty and weaving frameworks, in the hope that it will delay the wave of innovation that has seen them affecting their livelihood. For this example, alarming similarities to the present. China’s leadership, with a growing difference in clean technology, is related to its enormous trade surplus and Beijing’s desire to carry out, allowing it to overcome the local economic slowdown, falling with the stumbling of carbon removal efforts in developed countries and generating a toxic mixture. If green technology, such as electric vehicles, solar panels and home batteries, is classified as foreign and a threat and excluded by the laws and policies of customs duties, the big decline in their prices will not be sufficient to reach consumers. As false national security issues and industrial policies will be sufficient to exclude them. An indirect ban. We really see evidence indicating this on various continents. The requirements of local content and customs barriers on the solar panels, designed to support local manufacturing industries, were in various regions (including India, the United States, South Africa and Indonesia) as an indirect ban that contributed to increasing costs and increased the slowest distribution to generate electricity from fossil foods. The European Union, which does not impose fees for importing solar panels, has published about twice the number of panels published by the United States last year, and more than seven times the number of solar panels published by India, although the weather is much less suitable for this technology. The electric vehicles appear to be the next front in this conflict. The transformation of China of one of the world’s largest car countries in the world originated one of its largest exporters who anxiously anxious its commercial partners. Most of the export efforts have come so far from traditional cars, but China’s competitive advantage in technical innovation in electric vehicles highlighted the models of electric cars produced by the country. Dragon was indignant. The 25%customs duties imposed by the administration of former US President Donald Trump mean that only a limited number of Chinese vehicles on the roads in the United States generally appear, and that the presence of these vehicles in Europe is still not dominant. Nevertheless, in October, the European Union announced an investigation whether Chinese cars benefited from unique subsidies, and the White House opened an investigation into a Chinese technology last month that enables communication between cars, a technology that includes electric vehicles, along with many traditional cars. In light of the slowdown in European and US car manufacturers and the frequency of work on their targets to get rid of carbon and the fall in batteries prices, which are likely to make the cost of Chinese electric cars, the cost of traditional vehicles is the clear threat to import vehicles, the cheapest, most environmentally friendly and best. “Imagine whether there are thousands or hundreds of thousands of vehicles connected to China on US roads, and a person in Beijing can disrupt it immediately and at the same time.” A dark road that is the movie “The Red Dawn”, which focuses on cars, and it is strange considering that 60% of the cell phones equipped with sensors, imported over the past decade, have been made in China, and this percentage rises to about 90% if you add the manufacturer in Mexico and Southeast Asian countries that are usually used as a backdrop. This road could increase darker as the election of this year brought more protective politicians who overcome the rights of citizens to immigrants to replace the middle departments of the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Line in Brussels and US President Joe Biden in Washington. Just as we have seen in Japan, South Africa and India, it can be the simple adjustments to increase the mystery in the organizational rules that are significantly effective in disrupting the path of clean technology. This indicates that there is still room for the right populists to provide a more strict law on green technology instead of opposition, which was largely rhetorical and practiced by Trump’s departments and British premier Rishi Sonak. Removing bureaucracy can take steps on the side of this commercial conflict to avoid this lot. The developed countries must remove the bureaucracy that impedes their ambitious efforts to get rid of carbon and provides greater support for the demand for green technology. Manufacturers tend to believe that the targets of carbon removal can be left if the situation becomes more difficult, and this is rational doubts, so they do not invest strongly as their Chinese competitors who believe they have the support of the state. The result is the increasing dominance of China. These countries should also remember that what they currently have is not energy security. Raymondo’s nightmare vision that foreign tyrants destroyed transport networks did not need secret resources. Oil -exporting countries really affect energy markets to increase costs on industries and families to devastating levels. Beijing cannot appear sunlight on Chinese solar panels in Germany, but Moscow has already reduced gas supplies to Europe. Another effort on his part, China must realize that it cannot perform as much as it allows to overcome his current economic problems, and that his efforts to achieve them will accelerate the growing protectionist streams day after day for his commercial partners. The attempt to increase the consumption of families, instead of creating another wave for export wealth, is the best way to restore balance in their economy. By confronting the general global challenge of warming up the planet, it is imperative that the whole world work in harmony. It is not possible to accelerate the rate of the trade war for something, but to slow down our speed to the Nuldoel.