Questions raised about the army of Pakistan on the support of Gaza
New -Delhi, September 14 (IANS). The human crisis in Gaza was more than a year. Meanwhile, the army of Pakistan is being criticized again. Experts believe that Pakistan only talks about the support of Palestine in a beautiful way, but that it brings no change to actual policy. Despite many public statements condemning the Israeli invasion and asking “Muslim unit”, observers have argued that these signs are only symbolic. According to a comment published by ‘Middle East Monitor’, these statements are usually made when photos of children’s death in Gaza are discussed worldwide or when the battle is underway. The article states that Pakistani officials, especially the officials of the Ministry of Defense, on such occasions provide serious announcements of support. However, critics believe that these statements are more political plays than showing real diplomatic attitude. According to the analytical article, the real motives of the Pakistan army have long been different and have been working as a strategist for decades, not as a protector of the general Muslim interest of Rawalpindi. He regularly supported foreign powers to his advantage. This includes examples ranging from sending the army to suppress rebellion in Arab countries to support US military operations. The report said that the Palestinian issue was seen as a weapon of a rhetoric. If emotions are strengthened in public, it is increased, but real steps are never taken. The military justifies it as “national interest” and “strategic balance”, while the real purpose is to ensure its power and benefits. In a remarkable comparison, analysts also compare the army of Pakistan with Israel. They say that Pakistani generals are influenced by the Israeli system where the army dominates the government and increases its power in an atmosphere of crisis. However, Pakistan does not have capacity and global influence such as Israel. This criticism extends to Pakistan. The governments of many Muslim countries have also become quiet about the pain of Gaza. Golf countries deal with Israel. Türkiye and Egypt, despite the vocal condemnation, continue matters and border enforcement. Finally, it is concluded that real solidarity is not in the speeches of governments, but in ground level activism. Writers, workers and ordinary citizens are the voice of real resistance. The pain of Gaza continues, and the difference between the claims of Pakistan’s power and reality increases the disappointment in public. -Ians as/