Supreme Court: 'There is democracy in the country, they don't behave like Maharaya'

The Supreme Court on Thursday reprimanded a couple who was entangled in a marriage dispute that they should not act like a Maharaja, as democracy has been maintained in the country for more than 75 years. This remark from the Apex Court was targeted on the one hand with the couple who allegedly belonged to the royal dynasty. The court also underlined the conflict of ego in the case. Pti, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court on Thursday reprimanded a couple who was entangled in a marriage dispute that they should not act like a ‘Maharaja’, as democracy has been maintained in the country for more than 75 years. This remark from the Apex Court was targeted on the one hand involved with the couple, which allegedly belonged to the royal dynasty. The court also underlined the conflict of ego in the case. The Supreme Court proposed arbitration. A Bench of Justice Suryakant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh instructed the couple’s attorneys to talk to their clients and make the court aware of their intention. The bank warned that if no solution was found by arbitration, it would not hesitate to pass on strict orders within three days. The woman and a woman from her allegations of her allegations of Gwalior claimed to belong to a very sought after family, and Chhatrapati was admiral in the Navy of Shivaji Maharaj and was declared to the ruler of the Konkan region. On the other hand, her husband said he came from a family of military officers and operated an educational institution in Madhya Pradesh. Rolls Royce car is the root of the controversy, the first Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru ordered by the first Prime Minister of India for the then Queen of Baroda, the 1951 model’s antique handmade classic Rolls Rolls Rolls car, which is the only car of its model, and the current price is more than RS 2.50 CRore, in the case. The attorneys who appear on both sides told the court that the dispute was mainly focused on money. Judge Suryakant said: ‘We know that the agreement was not only reached because of ego in the case. If the dispute is about money, the court may solve it, but for this the parties will have to reach the consensus. The bank drafted the hearing for the next week, and the bank set the hearing for next week. On April 22, senior lawyer R Basant, who was appointed for mediation between the couple, informed the bank that both parties in the case could not reach the approved solution. He requested his back to give a chance to find a final attempt to find the possibility of a mutual consent solution between the two parties. The woman claimed that her husband and in -laws who plagued her separately in the dowry, with the claim of Rolls Royce car and an apartment in Mumbai. However, her husband denied the charge. The woman said in a petition submitted on behalf of the woman, in which they claimed that when the defendants’ claims were not met, they refused to accept the marriage and began to do false and trivial allegations against the temptator and violated her character. The man, who lives separately, has filed a case of fraud and forgery in preparing a marriage certificate against his wife, his parents and family members who live separately, while the woman filed a case of harassment and cruelty of the dowry. The Supreme Court rejected the fir submitted by the woman and said it was a later action. Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app