The Economic Court after the ruling on Mona Farouk: Respecting values ​​and principles is no longer an choice but rather a responsibility

01:39 PM


Thursday, January 30, 2025

Books- Saber Al-Mahlawi:

The Cairo Economic Court issued the reasons for its ruling within the case of the trial of the artist Mona Farouk, in accusing her of broadcasting a video clip stay by blueprint of the social networking net net site Teck Tok, fair like an assault on household values ​​and principles in society.

The 2d department, the Cairo Economic Misdemeanor Court, dominated that the artist Mona Farouk used to be imprisoned for 3 years with work and a guarantee of 10 thousand pounds to halt the implementation of the penalty of imprisonment temporarily and fined it for an amount of 100 thousand pounds and obligated her prison charges, attributable to a 16 -minute Vedic clip that included the enlighten material of the modesty by maintaining its adolescents from the disgraceful enlighten material in social media capabilities.

The court appealed to the Egyptian household: It could well perhaps presumably well desire to be tight to be distorted and calling on the Egyptian society to please in the household values ​​and principles which will be the nook stone in constructing a coherent and true society. To lift your contact with the Egyptian society and its identity, merely because the household is the first constructing block for the event of societies if the society is refined, all of which is, and if it’s some distance wrong, the society is all, and the Egyptian household that every particular person by blueprint of ancient previous used to be a mannequin to be followed in concord and giving, the course of goodness ought to remain to the course And the righteous.

These reward hang witnessed facts that order a large abuse of societal values ​​and morals by the accused, and a positive assault on the controls that desire the Egyptian household, and that the use of social conversation methodology, fair like “Tech Inform”, in scratching the shyness of the household and harming the societal principles is a foul topic that is terrible. The balance of society and its morals, merely as these practices are no longer handiest from the net net site of the Egyptian household, but also uncovered to young generations to valid risks, weakening their consciousness and keeping them faraway from their constructive objectives.

And the court, even if it sees the very fact that the liberty of belief is assured, and every human being has the refined to train his belief and put up it by announcing, writing, photographing, or diversified methodology of expression within the limits of law, permissible criticism and constructive criticism, guarantee of the protection of nationwide development. Which came as an absolute yr to incorporate belief within the many political, financial, social and scientific fields.

In say to develop that, the court concludes that what the accused has carried out and the accused of phrases within the visible passage used to be the context of the self -criticism and the liberty of belief, but it undoubtedly is an assault on the principles and household values ​​within the Egyptian society, and the court regretted that these phrases are issued from the accused of the accused of the accused of the accused of the accused of the accused. The Egyptian household, and the court invites every Egyptian household to play its pivotal role in maintaining its adolescents from excessive use of social media, especially the capabilities that will undergo containment that is incompatible with refined values ​​and principles, and folks and moms ought to quiet computer screen the use of their adolescents with these methodology, with the enlighten material of them, while directing them in opposition to the enlighten material. The purposeful and the constructions that enrich their minds and red meat up their values ​​and within the reduction of their viewing of the stay broadcast and visible sections that comprise the demolition of values ​​and household principles which will be based on the amount of views and which amplify because the increased set aside a matter to for them.

The court pointed out that the shortage of viewing will make a contribution vastly to the disappearance of these phenomena that handiest objective to entire non-public gains on the expense of morals and the soundness of society, and the court asserts that its message exceeds the amount of punishment to an invitation to every particular particular person in this society to undergo his responsibility in opposition to the household Respecting the values ​​and principles is no longer an choice, but rather a responsibility, and that the institution of these values ​​within the soul is the immunity fortress that protects the household and society from all makes an are attempting to raze or distort. Due to this truth, the judiciary when it interferes in such circumstances, no longer handiest to enforce the regulations, but also to alert each person about the hazard of prejudice to the foundations on which this enormous society used to be constructed, and the shortage of erection within the befriend of the electronic temptations that objective to destabilize the soundness of the household and unfold the contents of the ethics.

At closing, the court calls on all individuals of the neighborhood, childhood and adults, by confronting this phenomenon that begins with each person’s silence and to originate the use of social media methodology a technique of constructing, no longer to destroy, and a machine to unfold goodness and files, no longer to offend and sabotage, and from the intercourse of what used to be previously narrated, the court takes the accused from the accused. The depth attributable to the crime it dedicated.