Vice President Candidate Budarshan Reddy Differences between former judges, appeal to avoid political allegations -Old Judges divide over the oppositions VP candidate a clash of opinions

Vice presidential candidate of opposition -Reality CC former judges were divided into two parts over Sudarshan Reddy. 56 Former judges issued a statement stating that the judges should not get political allegations. He said the response to responding by former judges must be condemned by former judges. He believes that criticism does not threaten judicial freedom. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. Opposition -vise -President candidate Justice BK Sudarshan Reddy was broken down on Sudarshan Reddy. A few days ago, some former judges and senior advocates issued a statement questioning Justice Reddy’s decision on the decision of Salwa Judum, and now 56 other former judges have issued a counter-state to respond and respond to the former judges not to fall into political charges. Remove ad just read the news, 56 former judges, including former CJI Ranjan Gogoi, and P. Satishivam issued a statement condemning a group of former judges to respond to every political development. He said that judges should not get political allegations. The judiciary must be kept apart from all these things. 56 Former judges released the statement. The second group of 56 former Supreme Court judges and the Supreme Court said in a statement that they would register their strict disagreement on the statement recently issued by a group of retired judges and workers as former judges of this country. The statement issued by the new group said it became a pattern that when a major political developments occur, statements came from the same class. This statement is political exercise under the guise of the language of judicial freedom. Abuse of the coverage of judicial freedom, a group of 56 former judges said in a statement that this trend is very harmful to the institution in which they served. The released statement said that a retired judge decided on his own will to compete for the post of Vice President of India. He entered the political field as a candidate supported by the opposition. After doing so, he will have to defend his candidacy like any other participant in the field of political debate. In addition, the suggestion is to suppress democratic dialogue and abuse the guise of judicial freedom for political comfort. No threat to judicial freedom of criticism, the statement states that there is no threat to judicial freedom from the criticism of a political candidate. The reputation of the judiciary actually causes damage when the former judges repeatedly make biased statements, giving the institution that the institution itself is associated with the political struggle. Because of these things and the mistakes of some people, a large group of judges are portrayed as a biased group. It is not suitable or good for the judiciary or democracy of India. Therefore, we call on our judges of our brothers not to mention politics inspired by politics. Those who have chosen the path of politics let them defend themselves in that area. The judiciary must be kept away from these things. The 56 judges who issued the statement include Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Sathashivam, apart from the former judges of the Supreme Court Ak Sikri, Mr. Shah, former Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Suresh Kath, former chief justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court, Ali Mohammad Magre, etc.