The Army of the Army had the suspicion of extra marriage relationship with his wife, reached the court to ask CCTV footage and then ... -NCR New -Delhi Court rejects petition patriarchy and gender discransature unacceptable

The Delhi court rejected the petition of an army of the army of the army and said that patriarchal thinking and gender discrimination are now unacceptable. Major sought CCTV footage of the hotel to prove the woman’s outdoor matter. The court calls it a violation of the woman’s privacy and says that the thinking that women think about it is now old. Adultery is no longer a crime. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. The court rejected a petition filed by an army of an army demanding CCTV footage and discussing details of the hotel to prove the extramarital relationship between his wife and another major. Civil Judge Vaibhav Pratap Singh in Patiala House rejected the petition and said that the case was related to the woman’s privacy and that it could not be considered on the basis of the law. The court said India has now denied patriarchal thinking and gender discrimination. The court also quoted that when the Indian Parliament abolished the colonial penalty code and implemented the Code of India, adultery was excluded from the crime category. The hotel held this side in court. The court said it is the responsibility of the hotel to protect the privacy of its guests. The court said that if such petitions are approved, someone can ask personal information from another on the grounds that he is involved in a dispute. The court said it would be an open violation of the right to privacy. The court said that the thinking that the woman understands something or property is now outdated. Women have their own desire and rights. Major searched on January 25-26. The footage said that the problem of the officer may be moral, but that it is not acceptable within the legislation. The court said that the officer must accept the prescribed procedure in terms of the Army Act 1950 and related rules to file a complaint and submit evidence. The court cannot be used to ignore these procedures. The officer claimed in court that his wife and another major met in a hotel in Delhi on January 25 and 26 this year. He sought CCTV footage and discussed details about the two days of the hotel. But the court found that the officer did not make his wife or his lover as a party in his divorce application.