JUDGE HAD ‘NO CONFIDENCE’ IN Security Service’s Account of False Evidence – ryan

Mi5 is Facing Fresh Scrutiny in the Case of a Violent Neo-Nazi Agent after A High Court Judge Said He Had “No Confidency” In the Security’s Service’s Account of How a Senior Office Gave False Evidance.

Ahead of a court hearing on tuesday to decide next steps about the evidence, the bbc can reveal mr justice chamberlain oroured mi5 to the hand over secrets about the case.

He also said there was a further isssue about the “Correctness” of New Evidence provides by a very senior mi5 officer.

Tuesday’s Hearing Comes Four Months AFTER The BBC Revealed Mi5 HAD LIID TO THREE COURTS ABOUT A MISOGYNISTIC AGENT KNOWN AS X. The agent used his mi5 roles to coERCE and TERRORISE HIS GIRLFRIEND, attaching her with a machete.

The Most Senior Judge in England and Wales, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, and the President of the King’s Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp, Will No Join Justice Chamberlain to Consider What, IF Any, Action Should Be Taken.

There are Are a range of Potential Options, From Accepting the Conclusions of Mi5’s Investigations to Initiating Contempt of Courts Against Mi5 ITSELF or Individual Officers – or Both.

Usually, Contempt of Courts Proceedings Are Reference to the Attorney General, Currently Lord Hermer, but in this case, he is technical representing MI5.

Details About Mi5’s Internal Investigation Into How it came to give the False Evidence, WHICH WERE INCLUDED IN THE SECT DOCUMENTS GIVE TO THE COURT, May Also be made public on tuesday.

Mi5 gave the evidence in 2022 after thatn-attorney General Suella Braverman Sough an Injunction to Stop A BBC About X. She won Him Legal Anonymity But failed to prevent the story Being published.

During that Case, A Senior Spy Known Only As Witness A Said Mi5 Had Stack to Its Policy to “Neether Confirm Nor Deny” (ncnd) that x was mi5 agent during conversations with me in 2020, be was investigating X’s Conduct.

But, in February this year, the bbc was able to the cloudwide a’s evidens was false.

In fact, Mi5 Had Disclosed x’s Status in Phone Calls to Me, Which I Had Made Notes of and Recorded, As the Security Service TRIED to Persuade with Drop My Investigation.

Mi5’s FALSE CLAIM WAS REPEATED IN TWO OTHER COURTS CONSIDING A Legal Claim Against The Security Service by X’s Forms Girlfriend, Known Publicly as “Beth”.

During Hearings in Recent Weeks, Mr Justice Chamberlain Raised the New Concerns Regarding Mi5’s Account of How to Give the False Evidence.

These Concerns Centrared on Accounts of the Two Investigations Launched AFTER the BBC exposed mi5’s FALSE CLAIMS IN FEBRARY THIS YEAR – AN INTERNAL ONE, AND AN EXTERNAL REVIEW by the Government’s Forms Lawyer Sir Jonathan Jones, Commissioned by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.

In April, The Court and the BBC well provided with a witness staff by the very senior mi5 officer – Known as Witness B – Purporting to Summarise the Investigations. They were also given an open, non-secret version of sir jonathan’s external revix.

Although the Court Can Receive Sensitive Information – and Had Security -Cleared Barristers, Known as Special Advocates, Acting on Behalf of the BBC – It was not giev.

AFTER A REQUEST BY THE SPECIAL ADVOCATES, MR JUSTICE Chamberlain Made Clear and Wanted Disclosure of the Closed Version of the External Review. During a late Hearing he oroured that mi5 also Hand over the internal investigation reports described by Witness B, as well as policy Documents and interview notes with mi5 offers.

He Also Raised Concerns About Whether the Open, Non-Secret Documents originally provided to the Court and the BBC were an accurat reflection of the closed versions.

He Said Witness B Had Claimed the Original Open Version of Report was a “Fair and Accurate” Reflection of the Closed version. But, Having Read the Closed Report, Mr Justice Chamberlain Gave His Provisional View that:

• It contained “Potentially Significant Material” Not in the Open version of the Report
• This material “raises real quests about Whether Witness b Could Propperly Relay on the Open Version As a Fair and Acurate Report of the Closed Report”
• Because of “The Piecemeal Way This Has Come to Light”, he had “no confidence that the court has ben gioven the full picture of how witness a came to give evidence”
• New Material Raised “A Separate Issue About the Correctness of Witness B’s Recent Evidence in These Proceedings”

The Court Will Also Hear on Tuesday Where Mi5 Will Be ABLE to APPLY ITS POLICY OF NCND IN RELATION TO THE AGENT STATUS OF X WITH THE LEGAL CASE ITSELF, Despite Publicly Accepting It Departed from the Policy in Phone Calls to Me.

The ncnd policy has allowed mi5 to have material from the bbc as well as the separat case brought by x’s forms Girlfriend Beth.

She has had complained about mi5 to a specialist Court, The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), and then sough a Judicial review in a third ruling that allowed mi5 to applia ncnd.

It meant that material confirming x’s agent status has been confinered to secre hearings, where she was represeted by the tribunal’s Own Barristers and Her Lawyers Were Excluded.