He invalidated the contemporary of a house from Bahraini to his well-known other before his demise because he didn't leave him

The Sharia Supreme Court docket of Attraction invalidated a present, which is a house in Arad Wahba, Bahraini before his demise, with out his eight kids from a broken-down well-known other, and the court docket mentioned that the donor remained most modern and inhabited within the property, the matter of the pursuit except his demise, and the possession in which the king moved was now no longer achieved by the exit of the donor from the house before his demise no matter his possession of numerous alternative homes. The lawsuit takes its info, in step with what the lawyer Muhammad al -Sharabi mentioned, that the eight kids of Bahraini had been taken aback that their father’s well-known other transferred the possession of the house that he was in Arad to possession on the pretext that their father had gave him throughout his life, so they filed a lawsuit before the Sharia court docket, demanding the annulment of the present, stressing that it had occurred throughout the interval of demise and was then a shortage of trip. The first level issued its ruling to reject the lawsuit, and obligated the prosecutors charges and in alternate for the prices of law, however this ruling was now no longer accredited by the appellants, and to boot they challenged it, and to boot they requested the abolition of the ruling and the judiciary again to nullify the apt present and remember it as if it was now no longer and re -registration of the property within the name of the donor inherited the appellant The exact property doc for the exact property is the matter of the present contract. The lawyer pushed the law wrongly within the utility of the law and the provisions of the precise Sharia when he spent the court docket ruling of the first level to reject the case, based mostly completely on the bonds that collide with the texts of the law and the actuality of the lawsuit, and the violation of the fixed within the papers from the scientific stories of the order of the donor. And for him, that the gifted within the contemporary behaves the angel within the lifetime of the donor; In dispute for the apt possession to which the king strikes, and what Ibn Abi Zaid al -Qayrawani mentioned in his message: “There’s no longer any present, charity, or imprisonment, excluding with possession, if he dies before he is discipline to it, it’s an inheritance.” The commandment, except there may per chance be proof that contradicts that. ” He remained most modern and inhabited within the exact property the matter of the spot except his demise, and then the placement of the evacuation was now no longer achieved, and that the appellant against it did not have it right possession, or receives it or possesses right possession, or locations its hand on it, and then the appellant against it didn’t simplify its discipline matter place a watch on over the property, or appear in it because the proprietor of the proprietor, and did not have the profit of it or the arrest and evacuation of the life The commandment, precise because the decision is a jurisprudence that there may per chance be no longer any will for an inheritance. By canceling the appealed judgment, and the judiciary again to nullify the Sharia present and remember it as if it weren’t.