Does the central government have the right to cut Udaipur files? Delhi High Court raised questions - NCR Delhi High Court Center on Udaipur files Cuts New Delhi City News

The Delhi High Court has questioned the powers of the central government in the event of cutting the Udaipur files in the film. The court asked if the central government had the right to recommend six tracks in the film. The question was raised at the petition during the hearing to stop the release of the film. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. The Delhi High Court questioned the right of the central government to recommend the cut in the film during the hearing on a petition to stop the broadcast of the film Udaipur files. A Bank of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gela asked if the central government has the right to pass six cuts in the film using its review forces. Now the court will investigate whether the center has the right to order a cut in the film. The trial in the case will continue on Thursday. The court hears the petition of accused Mohammad Javed, in which he claims a ban on the release of the film based on the murder case Kanhaiya Lal. The petition said that the broadcast of the film would adversely affect his case during the hearing. The main bank raised the question when the Central Government and the Central Film Certification Board notified the Additional Attorney General (ASG) that the central government had proposed to make the producers of the film to make six cuts, in addition to a disclaimer. It is also said that although the film was again certified, it was not released to the producers due to the pending case in the Supreme Court. However, senior lawyer Manika Guruswamy, who was presented by the accused and a requester from Kanhaiya Lal, protested against Asg Tarka. On this, did the bank ask the ASG that the central government has authority under the law to tackle orders with regard to six cuts and others? The ASG argued that the film was filtered in two phases. First, the censorship board suggested 55 cuts and then the committee asked for another six cuts. In this way, a total of 61 tracks were done in the film. However, the bank said that the order accepted by the central government is not in line with the proceeds. On behalf of the accused, senior lawyer Maneka Guruswami said that 160 witnesses should still be investigated in the hearing and that the release of the film has endangered the right to hear the impartial hearing from his client. He also said that in terms of the Film Act, the central government does not have the right to make changes in the film, such as proposing cuts in the film, and adding the disconnection, censorship board. Reading PWD has also changed the tender process in Delhi, new rule has come into effect; Contractors will be sharpened