The home of dirt and disease is the vegetable market of Chandigar

The Supreme Court has become strict on the bad situation of the Chandigarh sector 26 greent market. The Supreme Court has been investigating itself, and the answer is why such a situation is. This market meets the needs of the entire city, but there is no cleanliness that gives rise to many types of diseases. The court ordered the administration to answer on August 19. Chandigarh Vegetable Mandi sector 26 Punjab and Haryana Supreme Court itself -Cognition State Bureau, Jagran: Chandigarh Punjab and the Haryana High Court reprimanded the UT administration by taking fruit and vegetable market (grain market) in Sector 26 of Chandigarar. The court said that the ignorance in Mandi has now turned into anarchy decades and that the officials responsible for this should answer. A Division Bank of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sheev Berry, while hearing the case, questioned the administration why you are holding a full chaos in the vegetable market. The court said that the Mandi situation is not only a threat to public health, but also a clear example of the actions of the administration. The Supreme Court noted the news published in the newspaper in which the status of the market is extremely worrying. According to the news, smelly garbage pile, mud -filled roads and transgressions, sector fruits come to the market. Street lights, roads and infrastructure Bros: The street lights, roads and infrastructure of the vegetable market are also in such a bad condition that it is not worth using. During the hearing, the UT administration told the court that the process of transferring Mandi to the new grain market in Sector 39 was started. However, in April, the Supreme Court banned the e-auction process of stores and showrooms. The prohibition was imposed on a petition submitted by the Aadhatiya Sangh of the Sector 26 grue market, stating that ‘Chandigarh estate rules’ did not apply to these Mandi. The court was told that the transfer plan was drawn up in 1996, but that it has not been implemented until now. This delay made the position of the Mandi more complicated. At the end of the hearing, the court adjourned the case by August 19, 2025 and ordered the UT administration to submit a detailed answer about the delay in the current status of the Mandi and the implementation of the transfer scheme. The court has made it clear that this type of situation will not work in the grain market. Responsible officials will have to answer and the administration will have to work to improve the situation.