The Chinese Byd -Chinese root its superiority over "Tesla" within five minutes

Sometimes the chart is just a scheme to show data. Sometimes, if you look at “Tesla” and “Byd” in early 2025, it reflects a deeper meaning. Tesla, the largest manufacturer of US electric vehicles, surprised the world this year with its public political attitude, the decline in sales and the share price. While “Byd”, his great Chinese participant, has announced the scientist who has just announced the latest style within five minutes. The symbolic meaning may not be clearer than that, as it reflects the superiority that China has achieved in electric vehicles compared to the United States, which is still working on internal dispute over the extent of the ‘awareness’ movement of electric cars. BYD has boasted the provision of a series of 400 km (248 miles) for new vehicles equipped with the Super E platform within five minutes, and that the begging should be treated for the same caution with any advertisement in the car sector. The delivery of a maximum power with a 1 megawatt capacity will be an unprecedented event in passenger cars, and raises questions about the length of battery life and the cost of creating ship stations at this level, including the appropriate updates of the electricity distribution network. On the other hand, “bed” is not a emerging company looking for financing, but rather the largest electric vehicles manufacturing business, including the external hybrid vehicles. Significant delivery increases the surprising progress of China that there are rumors that the first new vehicle delivery of the atd, which can use this ‘abducted’ on a date for April, will be considered a kidnapper for technology. Looking at the two things together, it will be a fundamental shift in the electric vehicle sector, and it will not be in the interests of “Tesla” or other American car manufacturers. Loading an electric vehicle in a period corresponding to car supply with traditional fuel will remove an important obstacle to the transformation of the internal combustion engines. Quick loading will not be relieved about the need to think about how to spend time while recharging the battery, but will also address the problem of anxiety from the distance the car also moves. And if the drawer is the same as the ease of fuel, there will be no justification for the power that runs out, and accordingly, the need to buy a large battery will be denied, which will also affect the demand for critical minerals. ‘Byfd’ said it would build 4 thousand 1 megawatt loading stations in China. If you reach it quickly- China’s progress in the electric vehicles sector will, which saw the most important launch in the San Francisco Bay area when Tesla launched the ‘Model S’ sedan a little over a decade. Elon Musk’s feeling of organizing an unusual event last week in the White House also shows President Donald Trump, known for his lack of support for electric vehicles- he buys the ‘Model S’ Tesla in an expression of support that has revealed much about the source of innovations in the current period. An exaggeration in evaluating the “Tesla” share impairs the involvement of Musk in politics with the trademark “Tesla”, but the biggest problem facing the company is the relatively old model group, despite the competitor of the competitors new models. While Tesla dropped the production plans to produce an electric car with a low cost, the “Cyber ​​Terry” truck launched a price of over $ 100,000, “Way the” and its competitors produced large amounts of a set of models at a price of less than 30 thousand dollars. Despite the decrease in the “Tesla” share, the price is still high if the profitability is 84 times, the equivalent of four times a double contribution. Tesla’s height is no longer justified by the promises of raising electric vehicles sales, and no longer depends on great expectations- although it is out of reach for self-managing taxis and robots. “Byd” has strengthened its provision by offering an advanced system to help manage as an essential function in most of its models, while the “Tesla” system costs thousands of extra dollars, although more technically develops. However, the challenge is not limited to ‘Tesla’, as I indicated in a previous article, the largest car businesses have the ‘manufactured crisis in China’, and the AFD announcement is a warning signal of this. The abducted loading performance will not lead to high sales of electric vehicles in the local market for “bed”- where two out of every three electric cars have already been sold, but also Chinese car businesses will provide for another power component that allows them to compete or dominate in the foreign markets. US dominance of cars has naturally decreased, the United States of course use customs duties as a tool to prevent Chinese technology from entering the country, but it deprives US drivers of benefits, while electric vehicles are currently the only motivation for the increase in car sales worldwide, in light of their benefit from the decline in batteries and their provision of uninterrupted preference. Therefore, it is difficult to expect how the best performance and more innovative electric vehicles enter the country forever. In addition, Trump’s preference for customs duties is increasing, and he threatens his threats to Mexico and Canada that businesses such as ‘General Motors’ and ‘Ford Motor’ are a serious turmoil; The protection of Detroit commercially will increase its dependence on high prices in the local market, impede the competition mechanism needed for innovation, and all this will happen while the supply chain in North America, which is carefully and carefully built. After the American industry identified the features of the car sector in most years of the twentieth century, it is now giving the chance to repeat it in the twenty -first century and quickly.