Gujarat: Two members of the cyber gang were arrested for the fraud of digital arrest fall of Ahmedabad arrested

Ahmedabad, September 17 (IANS). Gujarat’s Ahmedabad Cyber ​​Crime branch has caught two prominent members of an international cyber fraud gang cheating citizens on the pretext of digital arrest by digital arrest. Police Commissioner GS This action was done on the instructions of Malik. The Assistant Police Commissioner team under the supervision of the Joint Police Commissioner (Crime Branch) and Deputy Commissioner of Police (Cyber ​​Crime branch) achieved this success based on the information received. The arrested accused are Lovekesh Kumar (49 years old, resident New Moti Nagar, New -Delhi) and Anurag Gupta (44 years old, resident GMS Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand). Both previously arrested in similar cyber crimes and were on bail. These gang members earlier called the citizens of India by naming Voice Over IP (VoIP) technology and threatening them as police officers. He would say: “Your bank account is used in money laundering, for which your commission received. You have digital arrest under the Supreme Court warrant.” To intimidate, he used to talk about WhatsApp, video calls and government lawyers earlier as a false summons. All the money from the victims would disappear by transferring to a false account. According to the complaint filed with the Cybercrime police station, a complainant received a call from an unknown number from June 4, 2025 to June 27. The thugs said he was sending anti -Hindu and anti -government messages. Then asked to register a complaint with the Sahar police station in Mumbai, where it was forced to send documents to the false fax number. A thug said the account of the complainant is using Viveksdas (accused of the prison launching). False summons was sent to WhatsApp, and a government lawyer was spoken. After 24 -hour video, all the money was transferred from the complainant. A total of 86.22 lakh calls were transferred from RTGs to different accounts. In other cases, the same gang also filed more than 200 complaints. Both the accused has a case under sections 61 (2), 204, 308 (2), 316 (2), 336 (4), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2) and section 66 (c), 66 (d) of the IT Act. Police have warned that such calls should be reported immediately at 1930. -Ians Sch