Diego Pavia sues NCAA over Juco qualification rules; All you need to know about the matter

Diego Pavia, Vanderbilt -quarterback, brought the NCAA to court and contested his suitability for the transfers of the Junior College (Juco). His lawsuit, which argues that Juco years should not count against Division I qualifying, has caused a significant debate in the university’s football. Since Pavia has already played under an allocated waiver in the 2025 season, the matter will still unfold and ask questions about fairness, name, image and appearance (zero) opportunities and NCAA regulations. What is Diego Pavia’s background in university football? Diego Pavia’s university football trip started in 2020 at the New Mexico Military Institute, a junior college. The season did not count for the suitability due to releases of Covid-19. He stayed at the Juco level in 2021 before being transferred to New Mexico State, where he played two seasons (2022–2023). In 2024, Pavia moved to Vanderbilt and collected four seasons of suitability, five if the Covid year included. According to standard NCAA rules, 2024 would have been its final season. However, the lawsuit of Pavia argues that his Juco years are not against his eligible, giving him more time to compete and benefit from zero transactions. Why do Diego Pavia sue the NCAA? Diego Pavia filed his lawsuit in November 2024 with the argument that the NCAA by -laws are unfair Juco Transfers’ division I -qualifying. Typically, athletes get four seasons to compete, regardless of whether they played with a Juco or Section I program. Pavia’s case claims that the score of his Juco season 2021 at its four-year limit is contrary to the federal antitrust laws by limiting its ability to earn by zero opportunities at the Division I level. It should be noted that a judge ruled in his favor and granted a sixth year of suitability for 2025, although the NCAA appealed this decision. (More to follow)