'Top artist bullied because he didn't use AI': Reddit users' shares how their business replaces mid and senior staff

A recent Reddit post set on fire online bookings after an anonymous user claimed that the CEO (CEO) allegedly bullied one of the top performers’ because he did not use an AI product that aggressively promotes the executive. The post with the title ‘AI replacement is real’, contains a worrying shift in corporate space, as companies are increasingly assuming artificial intelligence to stay in the technology breed. Allegations of “bullying” about AI adoption The Reddit user has set out how a top employee is the victim of a zero tolerance policy to resist the CEO AI mandate. “One of the award -winning top performers, who referred to my current company, who does one to one with the CEO, told me that he was bullied in the call for 2 hours because he did not use the AI ​​product the CEO used,” the post states. The CEO plan to replace mid and senior employees, another disturbing development that the Reddit user noted is that the CEO is actively developing some AI instruments that will soon replace developers. The stated purpose will lead to a drastic restructuring of the workforce, as the CEO of the company intends to save costs by hiring only employees and interns and shooting all employees at the middle and senior level. “The CEO makes 15-20 AI instruments that will replace developers, the CEO said it would only rent collaborators and interns and fire and senior employees,” the Reddit user wrote in the post. The original Reddit post on the sub @indianworkplace The user also added another claim to the post where he mentioned that a round of dismissals had already taken place in their business, which targets key staff. “He (the CEO) fired the most clues and architects.” The post concluded with the dramatic phrase, ‘the end has come’, a growing anxiety about industries that have the impact of AI domination. Netizens respond to the post Reddit users who comment on the mail, while some disappointed, some offered their own opinions on the subject. A user said: “One of my former employer has replaced the content team (including me) with” AI workflow “to scale the production, they have drafted and lost all rankings and want to rent again,” and added that AI without a competent person can’t do much. Another user explained the rational rear companies that AI adopted, as they stated: “This CEO of the Tech is partly in FOMO (fear of missing out). You just want to increase the profit and do cost cuts. A user took a digging at the CEO in the post by saying: ‘The CEO clearly does not understand enough to think that it replaces developers. Was in the industry for ~ 30, which is still codes and part of the SLT, and I can tell you that AI is a wonderful tool in the hands of an ‘experienced’ developer. Debugation, with an unsafe code that will increase, but not the time to market if you use the CEO’s approach. “