Lesti Kejora questioned by police on the suspicion of copyright infringement asked 27 questions

Jakarta – Dangdut singer Lesti Kejora is questioned by investigators of the Ditreskrimsus Polda Metro Jaya regarding alleged copyright offenses reported by the songwriter or musician. Lesti was asked 27 questions during the four -hour exam. “(The number of questions) is more or less 27,” Lesti said to journalists at Polda Metro Jaya Wednesday (8/10/2025). Lesti said the investigation is about allegations of copyright infringement filed against her. Lesti was reluctant to comment further on the Song Royalty Polemic, which led her to report to Polda Metro Jaya. Browse to continue with the content “For me it is not my ability to answer. But in this case I am suspected. Today, Alhamdulillah, I was called here and I answered the call. I also answered the questions. Yes, just pray, it will be done quickly,” he explained. Lesti’s attorney, Sadrakh Seskoadi, said his party established communications with the reporting party. However, he said there were different things that could not be agreed between the two parties. “That we have communicated regularly. But there are some things we may not agree on, because these things we may not be able to explain because it’s long,” he said. “In terms of communication, it is therefore well established. So Mbak Lesti’s presence was just to fulfill a summons today. Because no matter what, procedures still have to be performed,” he added. For information, the musician report was made against Lesti Kejora on Saturday (18/5). Lesti Kejora was polished with regard to section 113 in collaboration with section 9 of the Act 28 of 2014 regarding Copyright. “The reporter is brother, the victim is YM alias Yd, a songwriter. Then the reporter is sister LK,” said Tuesday (20/5), head of public relations of Pansda Metro Jaya Brigadier -General Ade Ary Syam Indradi. Based on the reporter’s statement, Lesti Kejora allegedly covered the victim’s song and uploaded it to YouTube. This was done without the permission of the victim as the owner of the song. “Then the incident began in 2018 until now, it is known that the reports party covered several songs that belong to the victim and loaded it on several online media YouTube without the knowledge or permission of the victim,” he explained. (WNV/IDN)