Sandra Dewi's hopes for luxury bags and cars confiscated by the state

Jakarta – Actress Sandra Dewi hopes that the bags and luxury cars she gave to her husband, Harvey Moeis, which were confiscated by the state, can be returned. As a result, Sandra Dewi filed a lawsuit in court. Summarized by detikcom, Monday (20/10/2025), Sandra Dewi is the wife of Harvey Moeis, the accused in a corruption case in the management of tin commodities. The trial is ongoing until the judge at the Jakarta Corruption Court ruled that all assets belonging to Harvey Moeis be confiscated to the state. The decision was upheld by the panel of judges at the Jakarta High Court (PT). The judge said that the corruption court’s decision against Harvey should be changed in terms of prison terms and compensation. Meanwhile, the judges of the Jakarta High Court agreed with the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court for other rulings. Scroll to continue content “Meanwhile, the other decisions are still upheld as the decision of the Jakarta Corruption Court,” Judge Teguh Arianto said during the hearing. Corruption court judge declares Harvey’s assets confiscated. One of the decisions that the High Court judge upheld concerned Harvey’s assets. As is known, the judge of the Jakarta Corruption Court decided during the trial on Monday 23 December 2024 and ordered that all assets belonging to Harvey Moeis must be confiscated to the state. The assets seized ranged from gold, precious metals, luxury bags, land, to a luxury car as a gift for Harvey’s wife, actress Sandra Dewi. “In light of the evidence of assets belonging to the Defendant that were confiscated in the Defendant’s case, the panel of judges was of the opinion that the evidence of assets belonging to the Defendant was confiscated for the state and was calculated as a substitute for state financial losses that would be borne by the Defendant when the judgment was read out,” the judge said. Sandra Dewi Objects Sandra Dewi objected to the confiscation of suitcases and luxury cars. Sandra Dewi filed an objection at the Central Jakarta District Court. “It is true, currently a hearing is underway to object to the confiscation of assets filed by Sandra Dewi in the Harvey Moeis (her husband) corruption case,” Central Jakarta District Court spokesman Andi Saputra told reporters. The petitioners in objection number 7/PID.SUS/KEBERATAN/TPK/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst are Sandra Dewi, Kartika Dewi and Raymon Gunawan. Meanwhile, the respondent in this objection is the State Prosecutor at the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office. “The purpose of the objection is for the Petitioner to request the return of assets confiscated by the state,” he said. Sandra’s excuse for this objection is that as a third party with good intentions, the assets were legally acquired through endorsements, personal purchases, gifts, not related to criminal acts of corruption and there was an agreement to separate assets before the marriage. This objection hearing entered the evidence agenda last Friday (17/10) by presenting experts. “The hearing is led by the chairman of the panel, Rios Rahmanto. The hearing is still on the evidence agenda, the final hearing of expert investigation. Whether the objection request will be granted or not is up to the panel of judges to judge,” he said. When presented as a witness for Harvey at the Jakarta Corruption Court, Sandra Dewi said that she and Harvey made an agreement to separate their assets. Sandra admitted that she did not know about Harvey’s foreign dollar deposits. Attorney General’s office doesn’t care about that. The Office of the Attorney General (Kejagung) also responded. The AGO said the lawsuit can be filed and is regulated by law. “What is clear is that for third parties who have good intentions, please submit it, it is regulated in section 19 of the corruption law,” the head of the office of the attorney general, Anang Supriatna, said when asked for confirmation. Anang said the prosecutor would answer Sandra’s objections regarding the confiscation of assets deemed to be related to the tin management corruption case. He said the attorney general’s office would respect the court’s decision. “The prosecutor will of course answer and have arguments and evidence that will be presented at the trial, of course whatever the decision is, the court will decide and we will definitely respect it,” he said. (whn/deck)