Why should we follow the news of Elon Musk?

After months of question whether the fight was abolished within the trace cage, it is serious between Elon Musk and the Orman medal. Hey, that’s not true. So what is this conflict? It is a boring traditional issue of the future of humanity. Either way, it’s over. It seems that Musk is changing his opinion, while accusing the lawsuit in which he “opened” of Altamman failing to fulfill her promise to be an artificial intelligence platform “available to everyone” in exchange for some money. There is no comment from the CEO of Tesla yet, but declares his perception of the lawsuit. One of the reasons was perhaps a great waste of everyone’s time. I will leave the detailed criminal legal analysis of others. Instead, it seems a good opportunity to address the growing interest of the press in the presence of a mask and all his ideas during vigilance in the news agenda. A media rushed to the news of Musk on Monday of June -Miss was at least easily kidnapped from the press interest in ‘Apple’ regarding its new artificial intelligence ads, and this was done by a splash of anger to some extent on the “X” platform “Twitter” that he said he would ban the entry of “Apple” for his businesses. You may think that he will not do it, of course, so it seems at first glance that he did wrong to understand what Apple is doing with ‘Oben Ai’, as it is an extremely impractical proposal. Nevertheless, the media reported what he said, and hundreds of headlines were published in the newspapers. Two prominent angles in the Technology Press in the past or so indicated that the media was supposed to show more restraint, so Mike Masonic, the founder of the “Techdart”, published an article titled “Journalists: Not every bad idea that Ilon Musk earns a full news track (Hey Journalists: Not: Not: Warrants an entire News Cycle). What is a rush of (news) visits by people who cannot ignore the subject, whether it is or alienated. This raises a question whether Musk will find another place to make him feel similar. Without the source of life with which propaganda provides, it is, like many on the “X” platform he owns, just a riotherapy. However, an investigation into the allegations of Mask is that the problem is that everything that mask or almost publishes is worth publishing, even ridiculous matters. It is not necessary to remember that he is the third richest person in the world who runs 6 businesses. He also has a comparable influence on the media, cars, communications, space exploration and other areas. The fact that he acts as if a child is easy to provoke at times does not do so, but most of it is that it pays more attention. Sometimes his ridiculous tweets cannot lead to something, but other times a drug can cost him 20 million dollars and his presidency of the Tesla board. There is no doubt that the media coverage is its hatred, but it also helps to pave the way for those who have attacked them to submit their complaints to the judiciary, even if their success is minimal. Although Musk of course used media coverage to increase the price of ‘Tesla’ share for years, the same interest led to a very important investigation in its false and dangerous allegations of self -managed technology and other moral slips. The result of the voice of the shareholders last Thursday about the salary of mask is largely close to supporters and opponents -thanks for the media investigation in a mask behavior. The media bears part of the responsibility. Do these examples explain the media that pursues the herd style of responsibility? Not complete, and one of the means of resistance will be proposed in the mentioned investigative efforts, which are completely different from the topics of a similar short view aimed at the number of visitors published by the media less likely to do hard work, or who do not have enough resources for it. However, I am not sure of the possibility of getting one of them just without the other. Which suggests the possibility of preventing the media from covering the anger of mask, becoming more realistic or continuous, it is just the wishes. Therefore, just as it is the ongoing broadcast of everything a mask says, I’m angry, I’m afraid it should go on. Is the threat of a mask to prohibit the “Apple” devices from entering its businesses, just a ridiculous, angry and angry threat? Certainly, but how long does it prevent it from implementing? I even doubt that mask doesn’t realize when he’s serious. Regardless, we are forced to handle his news.