Jharkhand News: Debate in the investigation into the property of the MP Dhulu Mahato Complete, ruling in the Supreme Court is insured - Ranchi News Court Reserves order on Dhullu Mahtos property investigation

The Jharkhand High Court completed the trial about the pill related to the investigation into the property of Dhanbad -LP Dhulu Mahato and the ruling reserved. The requester Somnath Chatterjee accused Dhulu Mahato of being disproportionate and demanding an investigation into the property. The court sought information from the income tax department and SBI in the case. State Bureau, Ranchi. The Jhark Hand High Court SN Prasad and Justice Rajesh Kumar were heard on Monday on a pill submitted to investigate the property of Dhanbad -LP Dhulu Mahato. The court reserved its ruling after all the parties’ debate was completed. Somnath Chatterjee has submitted a petition to investigate the undeniable assets of MP Dhulu Mahato. During the previous hearing, the income tax department said that SBI Patna gave no information about the property of Dhulu Mahato. Many times it has been requested to know some facts related to the case, but no information has been given yet. The court then instructed to make SBI a defendant. The Supreme Court sought a report on the property of Dhulu Mahato. During this time, the Supreme Court sought a report of the income tax department on the property of Dhulu Mahato and asked what steps have been taken so far in the light of the court order in this case. The court also instructed the state government to provide the necessary information to the income tax department. During this time, the Supreme Court sought a report of the income tax department on the property of Dhulu Mahato and asked what steps have been taken so far in the light of the court order in this case. The court also instructed the state government to provide the necessary information to the income tax department. The petition submitted by Somnath Chatterjee said that Dhulu Mahato obtained many assets after becoming a MLA. During the nomination, he did not provide correct information about the property. Therefore, it must be investigated.