Aiims Professor Singh of the Anatomi Department of Rishikesh rejected the petition, the wipe machine is in the acquisition of acquisitions

Updated: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:14 am (IST) The Supreme Court rejected the petition of Professor Brijendra Singh in the event of irregularity in the acquisition of road machines in Aiims Rishikesh. He is accused of irregularities as a member of the tender committee. The CBI filed a fir in this case and filed a charge sheet. The court said the allegations revealed the crime. Jagran correspondent, Nainital. The Supreme Court rejected the petition of the Anatami Department of Professor Brijendra Singh and demanded that the case filed by the Anti Corruption Bureau for the CBI claimed in the case related to alleged irregularities in the purchase of road livestock in Aiims Rishikesh. Remove the ad, just read the news, Justice Ashish Naithani Panh said in his command that the allegations made at the tempter reveal the prima facie crime and that there is no basis for termination of action at this level. Pro. Brijendra Singh is accused of irregularities while being a member of the Tender Committee. Investigated by CBI’s anti -corruption bureau. On the charge of rig in the tender released on October 27, 2017 for the purchase of Road Sweeping Machine in Aiims Rishikesh, CBI Dehradun filed a fir on April 24, 2022, in which six people, including Brijendra Singh, were accused. It is alleged that members of the AIIMS evaluation and the acquisition of the store hatch a criminal conspiracy with Delhi’s firm M / S prommedic devices and owner Punet Sharma. He allegedly disqualified eligible bidders such as M / S Eureka Forbes Limited and M / S Iota Engineering Corporation, while unfit firms declared successfully. Also read vandalism with a class six student at the coaching center in Uttarakhand, serious over injury due to beating; The Tahrir Prof. Brijendra Singh was also a member of the committee. The committee misused two bidders and ignored the shortcomings of M / S prommedic devices. Which did aiim’s damage. The machine provided to this business also only lasted for a limited time. The CBI filed a charge page on December 30, 2023. Prof. Singh mentioned the allegations as wrong and said that his expertise was limited to medical education and teaching only. He was only ex -official member of this committee because of his post. His role was limited to the signing of a comparative card drawn up by junior administrative officials, and he did not set up or make up the tender specifications. While the CBI opposed the petition and argued that Prof. Singh was not just an alternative checker, but an active member of the store acquisition committee, who agreed to justify and disqualify incapacitated firms. It indicates collusion and cannot be rejected as mere negligence. After hearing the arguments from both sides, the court. Brijendra Singh’s petition was rejected.