Attorney reached the Supreme Court in the judge's house, the court rejected the petition to register a fir; That's the reason - the Supreme Court please reject for Fir against Justice Yashwant Varma over Cash Row, the first approach president and prime mi

The Supreme Court rejected the Fir’s petition in the case of cash received at the residence of Justice Yashwant Verma. The court said that the requester should have given a memorandum earlier. The court questioned the foregoing decision in the Veeraswamy case stating that permission from the CJI should be obtained before registering a fir against the judge. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to consider the plea of ​​Supreme Court Judge Yashwant Verma to register a fir in the case of cash at the government residence. The court ordered the requester to give a memorandum before the competent authority before submitting the petition. This order was given by a Bank of Justice Abhay’s Oka and Justice Ujjwal Bhuiyan. Refuse to consider Nedupara’s petition. The court said that the CJI, according to the press release issued on May 8 of the Supreme Court in this case, sent the internal investigation report and the response to the judge in question to the president and the prime minister. Advocate Nedupara questioned the former ruling in the Spreraswamy case of the Supreme Court, while saying that permission should be obtained from the CJI before registering a FIR against the current judge of the Supreme Court or Supreme Court, while arguing about the question requested on the previous decision. Nedupara demanded that the decision be declared incorrectly and that the police should be ordered to register a fir in the case of cash at the home of the Supreme Court Judge Yashwant Verma. He said the internal investigation system could be part of judicial discipline, but it could not be an option of criminal investigation. He said that according to the Act, a fir must be registered and that an investigation should be conducted in this case. The bank while hearing their arguments said that we do not say that you cannot submit a petition, but that you do not know the topic of internal report and that we do not even know it. Therefore, refusal to consider the claims, first request action from those with whom the case is pending. If they do not take action, you can come here. The court refused to consider the claims made in the petition. It may be noted that the Vice President recently submitted a fir in the case of cash from Justice Yashwant Verma’s home on the occasion of the release of a book. When Justice Yashwant Verma was a judge in the Delhi High Court, his government home caught fire on the night of March 14. A large amount of burned cash was found from a shopping room in his home while extinguishing the fire. In this case, the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court sent a report to the then Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna and declared the need to investigate the case in depth. Allahabad was transferred. After this, CJI Khanna formed a three -member Internal Supreme Court Investigation Committee to investigate the case. After receiving the report from the Investigation Committee, Justice Khanna sent the report and the answer to Justice Yashwant Verma to the President and the Prime Minister. Justice Verma was transferred to the Allahabad High Court after receiving cash from Delhi’s government house. Judicial functioning was withdrawn from Justice Verma. However, Justice Verma denied the allegations. According to the Constitution, any judge of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court can only be removed from the post by the prosecution in Parliament. Also read: In the case of Justice Yashwant Verma, the report submitted to CJI received a large amount of cash from the bungalow, every fresh news and accurate information from the cash country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app