Tejashwi Yadav has a heavy riot in the Bihar meeting of the Bihar meeting, and accused of stopping talking

On the third day of the monsoon session of the Bihar Legislative Assembly there was a sharp sound in the house. During this time, there was a strong debate between the ruling party and the opposition and the proceedings of the home was postponed amid great riot. Despite the riot, some issues were also discussed in the home. But the most important development took place when RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav claimed that he was not allowed to speak in the house. Tejashwi Yadav’s statement: After the end of the home’s proceedings, Tejashwi Yadav ended while talking to reporters that he had not had the full opportunity to express his opinion in the Bihar Legislative Assembly. He claimed that the ruling party was trying to stop him from speaking, which is against the dignity of democracy. He said: ‘I got up in the house to talk, but I can’t talk. This is the dictatorship of the government. ‘ Discussion during the riot: Although some important issues in the home were discussed amid the riot. The opposition has sought answers from the government on different issues, including issues such as roads and bridges, health services and education. At the same time, the government responded to the allegations of the opposition and called it part of politics. On behalf of the ruling party, the speaker tried to calm the riot, but the opposition emphasized its point. After the allegations of Tejashwi Yadav, opposition parties also targeted the Nitish Kumar government and said they did not protect the democratic values. The reaction of the government: On behalf of the government, the chief minister of the Legislative Assembly rejected the allegations and said that it was never our policy to stop anyone from talking in the home. He said: “Tejashwi Yadav got the chance to talk, but he couldn’t keep his point properly or in a reverent way.” The impact on the proceedings of the home: The proceedings of the house were postponed for half an hour for rioting. Once the proceedings started again, the opposition began a debate in the home with the claim that the government was busy with a conspiracy of power rather than working. After that, no important decision could be made in the proceedings and the session was postponed. Share this story -tags