Blake Tantalizing and Justin Baldoni’s Appropriate Battle: What We Know

Photo: Sony Shots/Courtesy Everett Series

After a messy press tour for the It Ends With Us adaptation and hurt to her recognition and kinds, Blake Tantalizing filed a lawsuit in opposition to Justin Baldoni; Wayfarer Studios; his disaster-PR group, the Agency Neighborhood; Melissa Nathan; and others for sexual harassment, retaliation, and more. On December 21, the Still York Cases detailed the claims in the doc, which alleged Baldoni hired the disaster-PR company to “bury” Tantalizing after she complained about Baldoni’s conduct on residence to the studio, threatening his “feminist” recognition. Baldoni and company. eventually fired assist with their contain $400 million lawsuit, accusing Tantalizing and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, of defamation and civil extortion; Baldoni additionally sued the Still York Cases for libel over the allegations in its piece.

Amid ongoing litigation, who is getting subpoenaed, and why turned into it practically Taylor Swift? Who has lower ties with Baldoni, and who is throwing public give a enhance to unhurried Tantalizing? Who else is suing Tantalizing? And what is on Baldoni’s web pages about the lawsuit? Underneath, right here’s essentially the most fashionable on all the pieces you would possibly most definitely perhaps perhaps most definitely need to know about the dueling claims in this apt battle, alongside side co-superstar what each and every apt group has had to say about some most fashionable dismissals.

One piece of Tantalizing’s lawsuit in opposition to Baldoni has been dropped: on June 3, court docket documents confirmed that Tantalizing’s claim of emotional peril had been dropped. Even though it wasn’t at the starting keep obvious who did the losing. First and vital it seemed adore a circulation on the Tantalizing apt group’s piece, but later in the day Contemplate Lewis Liman talked about he’d brushed apart the emotional peril claim altogether.

There are mute plently of claims to circulation, on the opposite hand. The 80-page December 20 preliminary criticism, which then developed correct into a lawsuit, essential factors Tantalizing’s problems with Baldoni for the interval of manufacturing that influenced Baldoni to retaliate in opposition to Tantalizing for the interval of the film’s press tour. At some stage in manufacturing, Tantalizing claims that Baldoni “improvised physical intimacy that had no longer been rehearsed, choreographed, or discussed with” her and tried so to add nudity and graphic scenes that weren’t in the fashioned script with out an intimacy coordinator shroud. After she raised concerns about Baldoni’s alleged conduct at the studio, the studio promised so to add safeguards in region for protection and, in one other contract, promised to no longer retaliate in opposition to the actress for her complaints.

Tantalizing additionally claims that after the click tour started for the film, Baldoni stepped some distance from the notion the group before all the pieces agreed upon, specializing in “female trauma” as an different of “female triumph.” The different cast participants and writer Colleen Hoover started doing promotional events with out Baldoni. Baldoni’s group reportedly desired to rep before fans who had been questioning why Baldoni turned into no longer selling with the relaxation of them. That is when Baldoni reportedly hired Melissa Nathan of the Agency Neighborhood PR to work on a retaliation campaign in opposition to Tantalizing, making a notion for that you simply would possibly most definitely perhaps perhaps most definitely judge of eventualities if Tantalizing spoke out in opposition to Baldoni. Jed Wallace turned into then hired; Wallace worked on a social-media technique to garner give a enhance to for Baldoni and his work on the film. “The narrative online is so freaking correct form and fans are mute sticking up for Justin, and there literally has been no pickup of these two articles, which is in level of truth gorgeous to me. However I leer this as a entire success, as does Justin,” publicist Jennifer Abel reportedly wrote in a textual whine message to Nathan.

In an announcement to the Cases, Tantalizing shared, “I’m hoping that my apt action helps pull assist the curtain on these sinful retaliatory ways to hurt folks that swear up about misconduct and helps give protection to others who would possibly most definitely perhaps perhaps be centered.”

The lawsuit essential factors how the smear campaign affected Tantalizing’s new hair-care line and how the “file-breaking” sales plummeted 56 percent to 78 percent after the backlash.

Consistent with Diversity, Tantalizing’s apt group talked about in a apt filing that the communications in the criticism had been received “through apt route of, alongside side a civil subpoena.” The group later specified that they got the messages by subpoenaing Joneswork LLC, the PR firm that previously represented Baldoni. The firm additionally previously employed Abel, who left and started her contain firm amid the It Ends With Us drama. Bryan Freedman — the lawyer for Baldoni, Abel, Nathan, and Baldoni’s Wayfarer Studios — talked about he plans to sue Joneswork founder Stephanie Jones. Freedman claims that in full context, the textual whine messages “unequivocally shroud that there turned into no smear campaign initiated at all,” and means that texts that shroud the truth had been “purposefully excluded.”

On December 24, Jones filed a lawsuit in opposition to Baldoni, Abel, and Nathan over claims that consist of breach of contract and defamation. The criticism alleges that Abel and Nathan conspired unhurried her assist with Baldoni to coordinate a “smear campaign” in opposition to Tantalizing, and are now making an are attempting responsible her for their alleged misconduct. “For months, this community has gaslit and disparaged Stephanie Jones and her company for monetary produce, to settle non-public rankings and most no longer too long previously to distract from their disgraceful smearing of Blake Tantalizing,” Jones’s lawyer, Kristin Tahler, talked about in an announcement to Vulture. “This lawsuit is a necessary step to terminate defendants’ persevering with misconduct and for Steph to rep properly the recognition she has worked decades to set up and which the defendants disparaged for their contain unsuitable functions.”

On February 12, 2025, Tantalizing’s apt group subpoenaed Justin Baldoni’s phone records, in quest of more texts. Per Diversity, they’re asking three carriers — AT&T, Verizon and T-Cell — in quest of records for Baldoni, Nathan, Abel, producer Jamey Heath, and Wayfarer Studios co-founder Steve Sarowitz. So demand more iMessages to advance.

On June 9, a settle brushed apart Baldoni’s countersuit of Blake Tantalizing, Ryan Reynolds, and publicist Leslie Sloane. Contemplate Liman talked about the statements Tantalizing made to the Cases had been safe by her defamation lawsuit, and that the statements made by Reynolds and Sloan had been apt echoes of what Tantalizing talked about. The best piece of the lawsuit that Baldoni is allowed to refile are any allegations about interference with contracts. Baldoni’s swimsuit in opposition to the Still York Cases turned into additionally brushed apart.

Baldoni, who has denied participating in sexual harassment or negative conduct, filed his $400 million lawsuit in opposition to Tantalizing, Ryan Reynolds, and the couple’s publicist on January 16. The swimsuit portrays the It Ends With Us war as a fight for inventive preserve a watch on, and accuses the defendants of defamation and civil extortion. Freedman, Baldoni’s lawyer, talked about in an announcement decried Tantalizing and her group’s “are attempting to demolish Justin Baldoni, his group and their respective companies by disseminating grossly edited, unsubstantiated, new and doctored records to the media.” He turned into suing alongside Wayfarer Studios and PR representatives Nathan and Abel.

Baldoni and Tantalizing previously each and every closed out 2024 by filing formal lawsuits on December 31. Tantalizing sued Baldoni for psychological effort and distress, excessive emotional peril, and lost wages; Baldoni sued the Still York Cases for libel, alleging that the publication defamed him with its piece about the alleged PR campaign in opposition to Tantalizing. His filing entails more context for the textual whine messages between Nathan and Abel, and alleges that the Cases unnoticed evidence “that contradicted (Tantalizing’s) claims and uncovered her appropriate motives.”

Tantalizing did a reserved victory lap on her Instagram tales, writing “Devour so many others, I’ve felt the bother of a retaliatory lawsuit, alongside side the manufactured shame that tries to ruin us. Whereas the swimsuit in opposition to me turned into defeated, so many don’t have the sources to wrestle assist. I’m more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every girl’s factual to have a notify in maintaining themselves, alongside side their security, their integrity, their dignity and their story.” Tantalizing’s apt group turned into more bellicose. “This day’s notion is a entire victory and a entire vindication for Blake Tantalizing, alongside with folks that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Occasions dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, alongside side Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, and The Still York Cases,” Tantalizing’s apt group talked about in an announcement to Diversity.

Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, called Tantalizing’s apt group’s “predictable declaration of victory is flawed.” In an announcement received by People, Freedman talked about “Ms. Tantalizing’s contain claims are no more staunch right this moment time than they had been the day old to this, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same self belief that we had when Ms. Tantalizing and her cohorts initiated this battle and ticket forward to her impending deposition, which I could be taking.”

On February 1, 2025, apt about a days sooner than their pre-trial hearing, Baldoni launched a online page online, no longer so slyly titled “thelawsuitinfo.com,” that comprises two links: a 224-page PDF of the amended criticism and a 138-page PDF of a “timeline of linked events.” The timeline comprises handpicked evidence linked to the manufacturing of It Ends With Us, adore messages touching on to the rooftop scene that Reynolds helped rewrite and discussions about Tantalizing’s properly being when filming. Just a few days later, one other web pages seemed titled “thelawsuitinfo.records.”Nevertheless, as an different of PDFs with a entire bunch of pages, it simply talked about: “Oppose abusive region of enterprise conduct, namely from managers,
alongside side administrators. Give a enhance to Blake Tantalizing’s effort to recommend for herself.” Nevertheless, it’s miles unclear if Tantalizing’s group or regarded as one of her supporters created the catch pages.

Disaster PR bag Jed Wallace, who the Still York Cases names in their story about Tantalizing’s fashioned criticism, is suing Tantalizing for $7 million in a lawsuit in federal court docket. Within the swimsuit filed on February 5, Wallace claims that neither he nor his company “had the relaxation to develop with the alleged sexual harassment, retaliation, failure to analyze or aiding and abetting the alleged harassment or alleged retaliation.” He additionally says that Tantalizing “weaponized a digital military” in opposition to him. “It is transparent retaliation in accordance with allegations contained within a sexual harassment and retaliation criticism that Ms. Tantalizing filed with the California Civil Rights Department,” Tantalizing’s lawyers talked about in an announcement in response the lawsuit to AP News. “Whereas this lawsuit will be brushed apart, we are fully gratified that Mr. Wallace has at final emerged from the shadows, and that he too will be held to blame in federal court docket.”

Skills company William Morris Endeavor has stopped representing him, Ari Emanuel (a chief government at WME’s guardian company, Endeavor) knowledgeable the Still York Cases on December 21. WME additionally represents Tantalizing and Reynolds, even though the company has denied that there turned into any stress from the couple to fall Baldoni.

A need to have Voices, a nonprofit supporting females, talked about in a December 23 commentary that it’s miles taking assist the Voices of Cohesion Award that it previously honored Baldoni with earlier in the month. “The communications among Mr. Baldoni and his publicists incorporated in the lawsuit — and the PR effort they shroud — are, by myself, contrary to the values of A need to have Voices and the spirit of the award,” the organization defined. “Now we have notified Mr. Baldoni that we have gotten rescinded this award.”

Liz Plank will now no longer co-host the Man Sufficient podcast with Baldoni, she introduced in an Instagram commentary shared on December 23. “We all deserve better, and I do know that together, we are in a position to murder it,” she wrote in piece. “I could have more to half at the moment as I continue to route of all the pieces that has took place. Within the meantime, I could continue to give a enhance to everybody who calls out injustice and holds the folks standing in their methodology to blame.”

Quite about a stars have backed Tantalizing since records of her filing. Hoover knowledgeable Tantalizing to “by no plan change” and “by no plan wilt” in an Instagram Checklist after she filed. Michele Morrone talked about he felt Tantalizing’s “effort” when he met her on the residence of A Uncomplicated Prefer 2, asking folks leaving “cruel and nasty” feedback to be taught the Cases file. Sklenar equally requested his followers to be taught the formal criticism through Instagram Reviews. And Slate stood by her It Ends With Us castmate, whom she called a “exact friend” and “depended on supply of emotional give a enhance to,” in an announcement to the This day shroud. “What has been published about the assault on Blake is amazingly dusky, stressful, and wholly threatening,” she added in piece.

Tantalizing’s Sisterhood of the Touring Pants co-stars The United States Ferrera, Amber Tamblyn, and Alexis Bledel equipped their give a enhance to in a joint commentary: “For the interval of the filming of It Ends With Us, we noticed her summon the courage to keep a requirement to for a right region of enterprise for herself and colleagues on residence,” they wrote, “and we are appalled to be taught the evidence of a premeditated and vindictive effort that ensued to discredit her notify.” Her A Uncomplicated Prefer director Paul Feig additionally supported her on X. Tantalizing’s union, SAG-AFTRA, expressed its give a enhance to for the actress in a brand new commentary on Monday, December 23, writing, “We applaud Blake Tantalizing’s courage in talking out on problems of retaliation and harassment and for her search records from to have an intimacy coordinator for all scenes with nudity or sexual whine. That is a in level of truth essential step that helps develop particular a right residence.” Actress Amber Heard additionally backed Tantalizing; Baldoni’s disaster publicist turned into additionally hired by her ex-husband Johnny Depp amid his defamation lawsuit in opposition to her.

On December 26, It’s Consistently Sunny in Philadelphia superstar Kaitlin Olson equipped Tantalizing her give a enhance to by sharing an Instagram Reel from the Cases protection with the caption “@blakelively is a form, ideal, factual and beneficiant particular person (and an not possible mom.) FYI.” Olson is famously married to Sunny co-superstar Rob McElhenney, who — additionally famously — is the co-proprietor of Wrexham AFC, a Welsh soccer group he bought with Ryan Reynolds.

Reluctantly! Baldoni’s apt group subpoenaed Swift in Could most definitely perhaps, alleging that Tantalizing and her apt group had extorted the singer. Freedman talked about Tantalizing’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb threatened to release “non-public textual whine messages of a non-public nature” if Swift didn’t topic a public commentary in give a enhance to of Tantalizing. That subpoena turned into struck down Could most definitely perhaps 15.

When the Still York Cases first published Tantalizing’s criticism in opposition to Baldoni, Sklenar encouraged his target market to be taught the overall article, apparently supporting Tantalizing. On February 17, Sklenar went on CBS Mornings to advertise 1923 when Gayle King talked to him about how he felt about the lawsuit. “I apt desire folks to be aware why we made the film in the first region and what it stands for, and apt conserving the level of hobby on that,” Sklenar defined. She then requested him if he turned into Personnel Blake or Personnel Justin. “I’m Personnel It Ends With Us,” he concluded.

Kjersti Flaa, the journalist who posted a now-viral clip of a previous interview with Tantalizing, suggested that she is collateral hurt in the It Ends With Us battle. Flaa’s resolution to half the venerable footage turned into talked about in the Still York Cases’ December 21 investigative feature about the alleged PR campaign in opposition to Tantalizing. (Within the video, Flaa congratulated Tantalizing, who had no longer too long previously introduced that she turned into pregnant, on her “runt bump.” Tantalizing replied by congratulating Flaa — who turned into no longer pregnant — on her “runt bump.”) The Cases piece factors out that Flaa posted previous interview clips with Johnny Depp with hashtags sending him give a enhance to for the interval of his trial in opposition to Amber Heard, and that Nathan, the disaster-PR vet hired by Baldoni, worked with Depp for the interval of that trial. “It turned into so gorgeous to be taught that in (the Cases), with this very sturdy insinuation that I turned into all for this alleged smear campaign,” Flaa knowledgeable The Hollywood Reporter, denying that Baldoni or his group had gotten in contact with her sooner than or after she posted the video.

Consistent with Flaa, she posted the clip with Tantalizing of her contain accord, in piece to spotlight what she sees because the dejected therapy that journalists can face from celebrities. Many individuals pointed to the alternate as a detrimental testament to Tantalizing’s persona. “The part is, she smeared herself in that video, and folks reacted to it online,” Flaa talked about. “(The motive) for her turning into unpopular is attributable to her contain conduct.” Still, the journalist talked about the amount of “hate” that Tantalizing got after the video turned into posted turned into “dreadful.” And as for essentially the most fashionable apt battle, Flaa talked about she’s going to wait to listen to “each and every side of the story” when Tantalizing’s and Baldoni’s lawsuits plug to court docket. We’ve yet to ogle if she’ll change her flip now that Baldoni’s lawsuit isn’t going forward.

This put up has been updated.

Connected