Ghaziabad Dog Attack: Failed to forget the bite of dogs, disappointment among people at the command of supremacy - NCR Ghaziabad Dog Bite Crisis Supreme Court decision disappointed residents of residents of residents

People are upset about the growing appearance of dog bite in Ghaziabad. The earlier order of the Supreme Court was relieved, but the new decision is disappointed. People say that public interest has been ignored as a result of dog lovers. People living in societies struggle with the problem of dogs and claim appropriate actions from the municipal corporation. In Ghaziabad, the incidents of dogs bite emerge. Jagran Samvadata, Ghaziabad. There are incidents of dog bite on the day of the city. Gali location, especially in societies, there are more cases of dog bite. People inhale a sigh of relief after the Supreme Court’s order to remove dogs from residential areas, but now the Supreme Court decision seemed disappointed on Friday. Remove ad, just read the news, people say that the Supreme Court has changed its decision due to some dog lovers. Public interest has been ignored. While the dogs cut people seriously by cutting the dogs. There were incidents of rabies infected by rabies, from bite to death. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court did not express the decision to keep in mind the public interest. People with whom the dogs were severely injured by cutting them through dogs are still not comfortable seeing dogs. The old phenomenon begins to meditate on the dogs. People living in societies responded differently to this issue. What did the people of society say? Dogs have many problems in societies. The problem could be solved, even if the municipal corporation gave the order given by the Supreme Court. Along with sterilization of dogs, animal lover should place food at the nutritional point itself. – Saurabh Sharma, president, Devika Skypers Society, on June 2, my husband was severely injured by cutting dogs throughout the body. There were stitches in many places throughout the body. The handbone was broken to be used. The decision of the Supreme Court caused great disappointment as a result of reverse, dogs should have been removed. Nidhi Jha, KDP Grand Savanna Society High Court earlier expressed that the decision on dogs was in the interests of the people. There was no significant difference in the rules already made in the decision given again. Now it is important that the municipal corporation is a place where there is no movement of people. Dogs should be banned in the societal premises. – Sachin Tyagi, President, Rajagar Extension Society of Federation