What is Article 142, the privilege of the judiciary, which questions the Vice President

The petitions that contest the WAQF amendment bill are being heard in the Supreme Court. He issued an interim order prohibiting the new appointments in the WAQF board for a week. To this, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar said something like that, which many people talking about democracy and constitution can be uncomfortable. He said in two words, Article 142 became a ‘nuclear missile’ that threatened democracy for twenty hours. After all, what is Article 142, which Dhankhar said. Dhankhar targeted the judiciary in a program. Said, the president’s decision is given, but no steps have been taken, despite the fact that he got cash from the crores at a judge’s home. With an emphasis on the need for judicial reforms in the country, it is now so important that even if Parliament accepts a great law, one judge stops it on a petition. If the judiciary, which becomes autocratic, is not made liable, the government will only be a name, only the Supreme Court will make a big decision. The way in which Vice President Dhankhar uttered angrily about the judiciary becomes important to know if Article 142 is, which gives the judiciary privilege. Know how the Constitution defined it. Article 142 of the Indian Constitution is a provision in which the Supreme Court has some privileges. Through this article, the Supreme Court can pronounce the ruling in cases where no law has been made. However, this decision should not be a violation of the Constitution. Article 142 of the Indian Constitution is a provision in which the Supreme Court has some privileges. (News18 ai) What is Article 142? In simple words, this article gives the Supreme Court special rights to ensure justice anyway. This enables the court to give any order according to the law that is in the interests of justice. This article gives the discretionary power to the court, which means that the court can make a decision according to its understanding anyway. The main purpose of this article is to ensure complete justice. This article provides flexibility to the court under different circumstances. Why is the article important? The most important aspect of this article is that this article protects the principle of justice. In many cases, the Supreme Court used this article to make social changes. This article also helps to improve the law. The court was also appreciated for this, in the early years of the development of Article 142, the general public and advocates appreciated the Supreme Court for their efforts to give full justice to various deprived divisions of society or to protect the environment. This article was an important contribution to the cleaning of the Taj Mahal and the justice to many people considered. However, there have been cases of extravagance over the past few years. Has some decisions to implement Article 142, also increases the problems of this, and has created uncertainty about the power of discretion contained in the courts, where the fundamental rights of individuals are ignored. Some historical decisions related to Article 142. Herewith there was also an order to give alternative 5 hectares of land on the Muslim side. In this ruling, the court clearly stated that he was doing “complete justice”. 2.. Command related to Bofors scam (1991) The Supreme Court gave one accused relief and said that the case was extended. The delay in the hearing affects the fundamental right of the accused. 3. Sahara-Sibi case Supreme Court has ordered the sale of Sahara Group Properties to get the money back to the underret investors. This step was taken below 142. 4 In the case of the death painter of Bethel Nut, the penalty (Union Carbide, 1989) Union Carbide Gas tragedy also gave relief to companies under Article 142, which was later quite disputed. 5.. After Ayodhya, the order to maintain peace after the decision, the Supreme Court ordered the central and state governments to ensure peace and order, it also falls under the erection of 142. Why is this article special? With this, the Supreme Court cannot decide not only by law, but according to Justice. It is a psychological balance tool for the court, which means or feels that where the law is silent, justice is spoken.