Updated: Di, 14 Oct 2025 04:25 PM (IST) A case will be registered at 250 beneficiaries who did not build homes under the housing scheme in a district of Uttar Pradesh. These beneficiaries are identified. The purpose of the scheme is to provide housing to everyone, and negligence in this will not be tolerated. The case will be filed at 250 beneficiaries who did not build homes. Samvad Sutra, Ambedkar Nagar. There is a preparation to submit a case for building a permanent home by taking funds from Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Rural and Chief Minister AWAS Yojana. On the instructions of the district magistrate and the project director of the District Rural Development Agency, the BDO and town secretaries filed a complaint to register a case against the identified 250 beneficiaries who did not build homes by taking the budget from these two housing schemes. Remove ads has only read news since the inception of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, the budget has been given to more than 63 thousand beneficiaries. Despite the use of benefits among the scheme in different years, a large number of beneficiaries did not build homes. By identifying such beneficiaries, the Department of Rural Development, together with the district administration, has sharpened the desire of action. After giving the final warning, there are now preparations to file a case against the beneficiaries for the abuse of government funds. District Magistrate Anupam Shukla sent a letter to Superintendent of Police Abhijit R Shankar in which he ordered all the police stations to register cases in the police stations against the beneficiaries who abuse government funds. Project Director Anil Singh said complaints about the abuse of government funds have been submitted from some blocks to the police stations by block development officials and village secretaries. After the rigor of the district administration and the rural development agency of the district administration and the district development, there was an increase in housing. There was an increase in housing construction. However, after taking the budget, some beneficiaries migrated to life district and non-provinces. The construction of homes is in limbo due to the death of some beneficiaries and their lack of dependents. The housing budget was also abused to meet illness and financial needs.
Case at 250 beneficiaries for building no homes in this district up, beneficiaries are marked – the housing scheme case at 250 beneficiaries for building not homes
