The protest was endlessly from Hasto's camp when KPK investigators testified

Jakarta -Arif Budi Raharjo, KPK investigator was presented by prosecutors in a hearing of alleged bribery cases and interrupted changes (PAW) members of the DPR for the Masaraku Maspan and the Pintangan defendant, the defendant of the PDIP secretary -General, Hasto Kristiyanto. Hasto’s camp objected immediately. This happened to the defendant Hasto at Jakarta Corruption Court, Central Jakarta, on Friday (5/16/2025) during the hearing. Arif Budi was presented as a witness. “The noble permit, this is what is offered, is an investigator, who wants to ask what we want to explain, then the division will be transferred because it becomes clear,” said Hasto’s lawyer, Ronny Talapessy. Browse to continue the content, Ronny referred to the KPK prosecutor who offered his investigator, AKBP Rossa Purbo Bekti, in the previous session as a witness. He said Rossa’s statement regarding the results of the exam is a case file that was currently tested during the hearing. “Because we heard that the information of another investigator named Rossa told me yesterday based on the results of the investigator set out in the file. Unilateral explanation does not have its investigator, Arif Budi Rahic, as a witness to the bribery case of the defendant Hasto Kristiyanto. do not cause. Ask for noble consent, “he said. Wawan Yunarwanto replied that the KPK prosecutor said that Arif’s presence was a series of facts witnesses for the Hasto case. He said Arif would explain the events to the Police Science College (PTIK) during the Catching Operation (OTT) on January 8, 2020. As our previous explanation that this witness is still a series of facts witnesses, and explains related to the events of January 8 in Ptik as our accusation in Article 21, so noble, “said KPK, Wawan Yunarwanto. The investigation of Arif as a witness. not, and not directly experienced, so that it has been proven that many people have been transferred, and it could even be classified as a construction with certain goals, which would probably make me burden, “Hasto said during the suspension of the Central Jakarta Corruption Court. Hasto also referred to the accusation of an intellectual actor. Judicial review to the Supreme Court (MA) related to Aaron in the Election District 1 of South Sumatra (South Sumatra), was the attitude of the PDIP DPP. was also surprised, was also referred to as an intellectual actor, only because it gave a direction, and then reported. Fatwa to the Supreme Court, “he said. He said the request of the Supreme Court Fatwa is an organizational action of party institutions. He said the case that caught him is a forced recycling hearing.” This is an organizational action; Someone is the same, when Arif packed a Sprin lids from the leadership, the Sprin Leach was not a person per person, but on behalf of the KPK institution, it was not the meaning of the issuance of Sprin lids and then as intellectual actor, “said Hasto. By investigators struggling to position the investigating officer simultaneously to see the investigator, who is evident from the investigation process, the person concerned is not a witness, “he added. Also look at” KPK Investigators: There is a leader “who dares to suspect Hasto?” Initially, Arif explained about the exposure of the bribery of my Masal Maspin according to the question of the KPK prosecutor. The agreement is related to the 8th, “Alvon protests.” Yes, it’s still about the process, his majesty, “the prosecutor said. Alvon questioned the relevance of the question. He asked the KPK prosecutor to focus on the question of the January 8, 2020 event.” Is it there? No, this is the team. That’s it. Now it has become an assumption. Well, maybe focus on the 8th. That’s all, the meeting. Thank you, “Continued Alvon. Hasto Kristiyanto (center). Photo: Ari Saputra/Detikcom The prosecutor said the question was a series of events of January 8, 2020. “The prosecutor said. The prosecutor said Arif did not see firsthand, but that it was the overall result of the team in the investigation process. Alvon returned to protest and wanted the prosecutor’s demand to focus on the investigation. “Yes, sorry, but the agreement is on the 8th. It’s all. It’s actually a fact -witness, right?” The facts associated with the exposure process, the arrest process, he joined everyone, the facts, and we asked in the trial, so it was not us. Sorry, the meeting we mean, firstly agreed that it is a factual witness. Chief Justice of the judges Rios Rahmanto mediated. Rios later asked Hasto’s legal team to give his own answer to the relevance of Arif’s statement. “Likewise, you just have to respond to the rights, this witness he experienced, he saw and experienced yourself. involved person explained the process when it was related to the team analysis. It spoke at that time of the incident, it was not only arrest, but it tells of the process, which has the results of the team analysis, “the judge said. ‘Later you just appreciate it, there will be relevance or not, yes. week, so that the KPK is not detected on January 8.