Jakarta – The step of Jakarta Metropolitan Police who arrested WFT, 22, the owner of the X @bjaransiaaaaa account, was a conversation. The coalition of civil society assesses that the WFT arrest step is right because there is strong evidence. As is known, the Hubbub appeared on social media after there was another account claiming to be Bjorka after the arrest of the owner of the @bjaransiaaa account. Another account that appears is @bjarasism. From posts distributed on social media, it is claimed that @bjarasism is leaking data from the National Nutrition Agency. This has increasingly caused a variety of reactions of a number of netizens on social media. Browse to continue the content, but for the Civil Society Coalition, as long as there is evidence, law enforcement of the owner of the @bjaranisiaaa account must be done. The Civil Society Coalition itself is a combination of several NGOs represented by Wahyudi Djafar from Raksha initiatives, all Araf of Centra Initiative, Ardi Manto Adiputra of Imparsial, Bhatara Ibnu Reza of De Jure and Julius Hebrew Pbhi. “Apart from the polemics regarding the authenticity of WHO BJORKA, it is meant? That the police have strong evidence related to the alleged criminal offenses committed by the @bjajajaransiaaa account, the law enforcement process must be carried out throughout,” the founder of the Raksha initiative Wahyudi djafar said in the statement of the Civil Coalition, Monday (6/10/2025). He explained that the series of issues related to data protection continues, even when Act No. 27/2022 on the protection of personal data was issued in October 2022. Unfortunately, the matter is often not processed by the law. “Unfortunately, from these cases, there is often no accountable legal process as a solution, exactly what happens is that the case continues to repeat, without the perpetrators and motives. Furthermore, he explained that the maintenance of criminal rights was applied to all who were against the law to obtain or gather personal information. Access to compensation (recovery), along with the criminal process, “he said. He emphasized that the case or @bjarasesiaa is a native of Bjorka or not, this is not something that should be debated on social media because there was another version of the relationship of the account that was also Bjorka.” @Bjarajarasiaaa, in the context of handling cybercrime (criminal offenses and electronic transactions), is actually not an important aspect that needs to be debated, “he said. He said. He said. He said. He said. Right to use any identity is not known as original (original) and false distinctions. While the @BarajarasiaAa account is a tool to give a crime, it is important for the debate of the pit of contempt of the version? Police have the fact that the figure of ‘Bjorka’ WFT was on the dark web on the dark web, on the dark web played on the dark web, played on the dark web, played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web web web web web we Where we played on the Dark Web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, where we played on the dark web, who started exploring the dark web since 2020, ” AKBP Fian Yunus Thursday told reporters. Explain. Able to get a clear facts. (RDP/FJP)
Civil coalition: @bajaransiaaaa should be investigated, the authenticity of ‘bjorka’ is not an important aspect
