Claim for immediate improvement in the list of judges of the Punjab High Court and Haryana

The recent judicial order of the Punjab High Court and Haryana revealed that one judge could not do a judge on a single day. Legal observers say the path that lies ahead in structural rebuild – which limits the number of diarrhea lists, rationalizes and judicial calendar management practices that accept physical, mental and constitutional boundaries of the back. International models limit daily trial to 25-30 cases, ensuring that every case gets the time, attention and audience that deserves it. Without such reforms, the high judiciary of India takes the risk of becoming a procedural funnel – where justice becomes in a hurry, it is not given. Computer of overload is no less than 245 cases, a back, one day and 1.22 minutes per case. These figures tell their own story. One of India’s busiest courts, at this time, handles 49 judges over 4.34 lakh cases. The burden of average cases per judge is at thousands. Nevertheless, the expectation continues: rational orders, hear the advocates patiently and ensure the time removal – and all in each case in less than two minutes. The court works from 10am to 1pm, and then from 14:00 to 16:00, which gives a total of five hours, that is, 300 minutes a day. If a determined judge wants to hear all cases, an average of 1.22 minutes can be given in a case with 245 listed cases. Even for the most effective back, it creates almost ridiculous conditions. A lawyer barely opens the file, then the judge must go to the next file. This court transforms the room into a conveyor belt-which destroys the form of the process of process. A former judge said: “Any person, how competent, also not within 70 seconds, cannot submit a fair judicial application.” Even procedural trial – including adjournment, interim relief or answer – requires understanding, communication and clarity. These processes, if done in a hurry, become formal and weakening both justice and judicial arguments. A large multitude of daily infrastructure cases, advocates, clerks and employees have placed a burden on the Supreme Court, parking capacity and support systems. The days when the list of cases is very high, the court rooms are crowded, the corridors are more full of place, and the judges are clearly sitting on the crowded places. A senior lawyer says: “Although the judges do not feel it deliberately, but a long -filled court room creates an invisible pressure. It affects mood, attention periods and decisive ability.” Parking crisis problem has become outdated, and the Supreme Court has issued several instructions to reduce it over time. Each measure was considered, from creating extra parking spaces to orders to convert specific areas into temporary parking areas. Nevertheless, the problem remains. An official, aware of the infrastructure plan, said: “It’s not just a matter of cars – it’s a symptom of how many crowds were done in the Supreme Court.” A lack of space is so severe that the Supreme Court is now forced to seriously convey the transfer of parts of its functioning to IT Park or Sarangpur Village. The officer further said, “It could not be thought five years ago.” Judges are not slow – there is a lot of burden on the system, unlike the general perception, the delay is rarely due to the time of judges. This is the last rescue line in an overloaded system. The Punjab High Court and Haryana currently have 49 judges who handle more than 4.34 lakh pending cases – an average of about 9,000 cases per judge. When judges are assigned more than 200 cases a day, regular procedures – such as reading files, the audience of a side or writing a small order – also a race against time. Constitutional justice cannot be given in seconds.