Objection to the decision of the Collegium to promote right panoli, Justice Nagratna raised questions - Justice Nagarathna expressed disagreement with college to promote Justice Pancholi
Justice BV Nagaratna of the Supreme Court expressed strong disagreement over the recommendation of the college to promote the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Patna, Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, in the Supreme Court. He said this appointment would be adversely affected for justice. He also questioned the seniority of Justice Pancholi. Justice Nagaratna also raised the issue of regional representation in the Supreme Court. Pti, New -Delhi. Justice BV Nagaratna of the Supreme Court expressed strong disagreement over the recommendation of the college to promote the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Patna, Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, in the Supreme Court. He said this appointment would be adversely affected for justice. Remove ad, just read the news, Justice Nagaratna also raised the issue of regional representation in the Supreme Court, he also questioned the seniority of Justice Pancholi. He is currently 57th place among all the Supreme Court judges across the country in the rank of seniority of the Supreme Court judges. Justice Nagaratna also raised the issue of regional representation in the Supreme Court. The collegium, which was in the collegium, held a meeting on August 25 and recommended the name of Justice Pancholi with a majority of 4-1 at the center. The college included Chief Justice Br Gavai, Justice Suryakant, Justice Vikramnath and Justice JK Maheshwari, except Justice Nagratna. If Justice Pancholi becomes a judge of the Supreme Court, in October 2031 he will become the Chief Justice of India after the retirement of Justice Jaymalya Bagchi. Justice Nagratna, the only Supreme Court woman, presented several reasons in her opinion. He said the promotion of Justice Pancholi would be adversely affected by the judiciary despite his low seniority and the conditions of transfer from the Gujarat High Court to the Patna High Court. According to sources, Justice Nagratna also mentioned that promoting its appointment could weaken the reliability of the Collegium system. He described the transfer of Justice Pancholi in July 2023 as a careful thoughtful step. Justice Nagratna also raised the issues of regional representation in the Supreme Court. Judge Justice NV Anjaria was also promoted in the Supreme Court and said that Judge NV Anjaria, another judge of the Gujarat High Court, was also promoted in the Supreme Court about three months ago. The NGOs for NGOs for Judicial Liability and Reforms (CJar) also issued a statement on the issue and called the Collegium’s decision a violation of the standards of transparency. Referring to the disagreement of Justice Nagaratna, Cjar said it was not clear what impressed the collegium to recommend Justice Pancholi.