"We can't interfere because ..." 26 killed in Pahalgam declared sacrifices

A pill (pill) was filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court and demanded that 26 tourists died on April 22 in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The petition was heard in the Supreme Court on Tuesday and the petition was rejected during the trial. Lieutenant Vinay Narwal of the Indian Navy was also tortured in this attack. Earlier, the petition was heard on Tuesday last week. The court reserved its verdict during the hearing. This pill was submitted by Ayush Ahuja, lawyer of the Supreme Court. The requester argued that the innocent tourists killed were targeted by the terrorists on the basis of religion. Tourists face terrorists like soldiers, they need to get martyr status. Additional attorney -General Satyapal Jain, offered by the central government, opposed the application and said the applicant did not know what steps the government of India was taking. He said we are in a position of possible war, it is not appropriate to set up such issues at this time. Chief Justice Sheel Nagu said that if a soldier is tortured, it takes at least one year to give him the award. The applicant must now wait patiently in this case. The petition demanded to declare martyr Hindu Valley and demanded that Pahalgam be declared a memorable martyr Hindu Valley tourist destination. When he hears the case, did a bank of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumit Goel say whether he should declare him a martyr in terms of section 226 of the Constitution? Give an example of this. It is an administrative matter, a policy matter and must be left to the executive. Can we do that? After listening to all the parties, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu said he would take the order and that the court had reserved the verdict. Share this story -tags