Delhi HC sets CIC -Bevel aside to disclose information about the degree of PM Modi
The Delhi High Court on Monday set aside an order from the Central Information Commission (CIC) that made the disclosure of information about the Bachelor Narendra Modi Prime Minister Narendra. Justice Sachin Datta, who reserved the ruling on February 27, accepted the ruling on the plea of Delhi University that challenged the CIC order. After an RTI application by One Neeraj, on December 21, 2016, the CIC allowed the records of all students who cleaned the BA exam in 1978 -the year that Premier Modi also passed it. The Delhi High Court on Wednesday postponed the ruling of the ruling on the plea of Delhi University that challenges a CIC order that has the disclosure of information about the Bachelor Narendra Modi Premier Narendra Modi, which issued the disclosure of the Bachelor Narendra Modi. Justice Sachin Datta, who was scheduled to give the verdict around 2:30 pm, did not serve today. The verdict was probably pronounced on August 25. At the time of the arguments, the attorney General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for Du, argued that the CIC order was earned to be set aside for the ‘right to privacy’ the ‘right to know’. However, Mehta said the university is prepared to show its record of Modi’s degree to the court, but cannot reveal the same for ‘investigation by strangers’ under the RTI Act. The court reserved its ruling on other similar petitions that would also be expressed. After an RTI application by One Neeraj, the Central Information Commission (CIC) on December 21, 2016 allowed the records of all students who cleared the BA exam in 1978 -the year that Premier Modi also passed it. The Supreme Court remained the CIC order on January 23, 2017. Du disputed the CIC order on the grounds that it had the information of students in a fiduciary capacity and “mere curiosity” in the absence of public interest, no one had the right to seek private information under the RTI law. Earlier, the lawyer for the RTI applicants defended the CIC’s order on the grounds that the law on the right to information (RTI) provided for the disclosure of the prime minister’s educational information in greater public interest.