During the hearing, the lawyer threatened the Supreme Court Judge to investigate the Bar Council - advocate threatened the judge of the Jharkhand High Court during the hearing of the trial of the Board of Beer.

Updated: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:22 am (IST) Ranchi Supreme Court rejected the bail of two requesters in a Bokaro Chas police station. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the behavior of lawyer Rakesh Kumar and considered it contempt. An immediate action was not done at the request of the Bar Council, the investigation was handed over to the Bar Council. The lawyer is accused of seizing the land of an 80 -year -old man. State Bureau, Ranchi. Judge Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi of the Jharkhand High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail requests of two requesters in a land dispute case in the Chas police station of Bokaro. The court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the shouting and threatening behavior in the court chamber of the applicants’ lawyer Rakesh Kumar. The court described this as a case of criminal disdain, but at the request of the Advocate Association members, who did not act immediately against the lawyer, he instructed to send the case to the chair of the Jharkhand State Council Council. Remove ad, just read the news. The court said in its order that this conduct of the lawyer is an attack on the credibility of the judiciary. However, the president, secretary and other senior advocates of the Barie Association present in court requested advocate Rakesh Kumar a chance. Based on the responsibility of the investigation to the chairman of the Bar Council, the court entrusted the responsibility to investigate the case to the president of the Jharkhand State Bar Council, and not immediate contempt against him. The president of the Rajendra Krishna Bar Council was also present in the court room at the time of the incident. The court register was instructed to send this order to the chairman of the Bar Council immediately. The case is related to the Chas police station, which claims to grab. Rakesh Kumar, a lawyer of the ownership of the ownership of the disputed land, claims that his clients are falsely involved and that they own the disputed land. The court did not accept this argument. Justice Sk Dwivedi said in his command that the applicant had serious allegations to seize the land of an 80 -year -old man and that his criminal history was also revealed. The court threatened to go to the Supreme Court, and said that such a crime is very common in Jharkhand and that it would not be appropriate to give bail in such cases. After the bail pleader was rejected, the Applicant’s lawyer began protesting hard in the court chamber and threatened the judge to go to the Supreme Court. The court described the incident as an attempt to impede the right process and contempt court. The court said that it is the responsibility of all to maintain the dignity of the judiciary and that such behavior in the court room cannot be tolerated.