Tejashwi Yadav chose a voters.

Prior to the election in the Bihar meeting, the politics of the voter list reform, the politics of Patna to Delhi was warm due to special intensive review (SIR). RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav opened a front on Sir and has now threatened to boycott the elections in the meeting. Tejashwi clearly said that if this is the case, there is no use to participate in the election. Tejashwi Yadav said that if the Electoral Commission does not bring transparency, the ‘Grand Alliance’ can boycott the Bihar election. Tejashwi said we would discuss the election boycott with our colleagues because the public wants to know and what other parties want. Tejashwi said that when elections are not held honest, why are elections held? Give the BJP extension in Bihar. He said the election was compromised. What is the use of participation in elections in such a situation? In such a situation, the biggest question is that if all the parties involved in the Grand Alliance will not be elections? What will happen if Tejashwi is boycotted? The way in which RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav spoke of boycott of election can take Bihar’s politics a new turn. Since the announcement of Tejashwi, everyone’s eyes have been on the decision of the Grand Alliance. Experts believe that the Electoral Commission is a constitutional institution in India and that it is impossible to stop the election process by boycotting any party or coalition. Supreme Court advocate Dhruv Gupta says the work of the Electoral Commission should hold elections. In terms of section 324 of the Constitution, the Electoral Commission has the right to hold elections, determine and control the process. No one can stop it. The Electoral Commission decides that elections should be fair. Become a participant, that is, whatever you want and get an equal chance. Don’t bias with anyone. MP Pappu Yadav also said that if the Electoral Commission is not ready, the election boyicot will be the last option. The expulsion of Tejashwi will not have an impact, it is the responsibility of the Electoral Commission to execute the election on time. In such a situation, if a political party decision, it only affects the political strategy of that party, not the election process. Therefore, any party must participate in it or not. If only the ruling party, that is, the party running the government, makes its candidate in the election, whether there is also an independent candidate, then it is the responsibility of the Electoral Commission to execute elections. Election boycott by Tejashwi Yadav or Grand Alliance will have no effect. Yes, it is decided that if the opposition is united, it can cause confusion and distrust among the public and voters, which can affect the voting percentage. In addition, there will be no impediment in the election process. Election boycott from Kashmir to Northeast, although Tejashwi Yadav for the first time in Bihar boycott, the election of Jammu and Kashmir to northeast was boycotted. The seed of election boycott was sown by the national conference, which claims to be the basis of democracy in Jammu and Kashmir, not by a separatist party. In this way, from Kashmir to Northeast, political parties boycott elections, but it had no effect on elections. Examples of election boycott were seen in the country when, where, where to boycott elections, but its impact was limited. In 1989–90, separatist organizations and some local parties boycotted elections due to a turbulent situation in Jammu and Kashmir. However, sheikh Abdullah brought this practice here. He always participated in elections based on the profit and loss of his party politics and boycotted him. 1989 Mizoram Meeting Elections: Mizo National Front (MNF) boycott elections against the congressional government. As a result, the congress has already won 40 seats, but later the opposition parties challenged it. The case is after the Supreme Court, where the court said that Boycott is not invalidating, provided the process is valid. It sits perfectly on Bihar. The history of election boycott in Kashmir was the national conference of Sheikh Abdullah and another Muslim conference in 1946 in the starring role in Kashmir politics. At the time, the Maharaja called the election of the Praja Sabha, but Sheikh Abdullah announced the boycott of the election. The Muslim conference participated in the election and won a majority. The national conference did not participate in all elections held in Kashmir from 1953 to 1972. Thereafter, the national conference also boycotted the 1996 parliamentary election. In addition, Afzal Baig’s referendum front also stayed away from the election. Some opposition parties, especially separatist organizations, announced the boycott of the Jammu and Kashmir election in 1999. Despite this, elections were held in the state and the national conference formed the government. Even after this, separatist organizations launched elections of boycott campaign, but it had no effect. Election boycott order in Mizoram has been announced to boycott elections in Mizoram, Northeast. In the Mizoram meeting election in 1989, the Mizo National Front (Mizo National Front) boycotted the election against the congressional government. She also won 40 seats. After this, opposition parties challenged it. The case went to the Supreme Court, where the court said that the boycott invites no election, provided the process is valid. Local organizations in northeastern states such as Manipur and Nagaland also claimed election boycott in Punjab-Haryana. He called on boycott. In these cases, however, the election process did not stop, but ended with a low rise. In 1991, Congress boycotted the election in the Punjab meeting, but the election was canceled after the murder of Rajiv Gandhi. In addition, opposition parties in the Haryana Panchayat election in 2014 boycotted elections in some areas to protest against education and revenue criteria. Even after this, the Electoral Commission held elections. What will be the effect of a boycott decision in Bihar? The term of the Bihar law meeting ends on November 22, 2025 and elections are expected in October-November. The process of Sir will be completed by September 30, after which it will be important to see the next step of the opposition. This statement of Tejashwi is just a strategy of pressure or will really lead to boycott, it will be cleaned in the coming days. Currently, the issue of CRI is hot in Bihar politics, and the public’s eyes are on it. The opposition announces the election boycott, which will have no direct impact, but it is believed that it is a bet of political pressure.