Eligible candidates available, so why not released the complete result … Assistant Acharya sought an answer from the government and JSSC in the appointment case – if eligible candidates are available, then the full result did not relieve the government

The petition filed against the appointment of Assistant Acharya (Class six-eight) in the Jharkhand High Court was heard. After the hearing, the court sought answers from the government and JSSC. The Court asked the JSSC that when the applicants fulfilled all types of bodies and the seats, why the results of the applicants were not released. The Supreme Court sought an answer from the government and JSSC in the appointment case of the Acharya Assistant. State Bureau, Ranchi. The petition was heard against the appointment of Assistant Acharya (Class six-eight) in the Justice Anand Sen of the Jharkhand High Court. After the hearing, the court sought answers from the government and JSSC. The Court asked the JSSC that when the applicants fulfilled all types of bodies and the seats, why the results of the applicants were not released. The court remained the transfer of the remaining seats until the next hearing. The next trial in the case will be held in December. In this regard, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of 355 candidates, including Mahendra Ravani. Remove the ad, just read the news, it was found that everything was correct, but not selected in the final result, Advocate Amritansh Vats told the court that the advertisement was issued by JSSC for the appointment of Assistant Acharya. The applicants applied applications for the post of science teacher. After the choice, everyone’s documents were also confirmed. The commission was not issued for 1119 posts, after verification, the commission considered the certificates of all the candidates correct. But they were not selected in the final result. While the posts of 2504 teachers for teachers who are not in the trade were. In this, only 1385 candidates were released. On behalf of the applicants, it was also said that the results of those who get less and equal marks from the candidates are exempt. The applicants fulfill all kinds of abstinence. The commission also accepted the certificates, including their application. Even then, their results were not released. The court said that if the seats were vacant and the documents of the applicants were verified, which had no mistake, why the results were not released. The court sought answers from the government and JSSC at the said point.