Juror Booted over Lying About Residence – ryan

Illustration: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters

For weeks updates on all the Most pivotal and dramatic moments from diddy’s trial, Sign up for Our Newsletter: Court Appeanance: United States v. Diddyand check out the rest of the Our Trial Coverage here.

Sean “Diddy” Combs’s Sex-Trafficking Trial in Manhattan Federal Court Resumed on June 16 With A Bit of Early Morning Drama, when A Juror Was Booted for Making Inconsistent States Where He Lives. Juror No. 6 Said During the Voir Direction of Selection – When Prospects are asced Questions – that he lived in the bronx with his fancer and daughter. During a recent conversation with someone in the court Jury Department, Howver, Juror No. 6 Said he recently Moved to New Jersey. This Jury Department Employee, in Turn, Told the Court. Judge Gold Subramanian then Asked Juror No. 6 About these storms During a conference in His Robing Room. While Subramanian Said Early on June 13 He was Leaning Toward Keeping Juror No. 6 on the panel, his tune haad changed come the afternion. Subramanian said that it was used by the lunch break to look over transcripts from the selection process and robing-room chat and was not happy with what he saw.

“When the juror was as as as they can be asked in the robing room where his daghter lives, he indicated that his daughter live in new jersey with his his – he said girlfriend, but the courses assumes that the Fiancée is the girlfriend. The Robing-Room Transcript on that Particular Issue, ”Subramanian Said. “In the voir direction transcript we are as asing who lived with, he identified his fiancée and daughter, who robing-rom transcript Indicated in new jersey, not in new York, but omitted the aunt who did in New York.”

“The will is that is that that is some is some suggestion that eather the juror was unable to follow instruction and ansower symple Questions, or if there is any effhority to be – to shade the trunk or be deceptive,” Subramanian said Last Week. “There are Ares Serious Questions About the Juror’s Candor and the Juror’s Ability to Follow the Courts Instructions; and when we get to the point of the case late, the ability of the juror to appliance the law to the facts Clearly gig. Subramanian Also Said “The Changing Answers and Inconsissothons Give the Court World Deception and Lying, which sturgery implicates the veracity of other aneswers that the juror aneswered during the voir direct process, including about the mirads of the mr. The case. ”

Subramanian officiously deciding on Juror No. 6 Monday Morning, Reiterating What He Said Last Week. “The Record Raises Serious Concerns About the Juror’s Candor and Whether He Shaded Answers to Get on, and Stay on, The Jury,” Subramanian Said. The inconsistency possess a “thread” to the Judicial process. “This is if the juror had an excuse or explanation… that was to be anOther set of shifting ansors,” Subramanian Said. “There’s the noting the Juror Could Say at this point to put the genie back in the bottle.” Subramanian Also Pushed Back About Defense Claims that kicking Juror No. 6, Who is Black, off the panel to make this panel mess divers, saying it beu? 6’s breed to factor into his decision. Diddy, who was wearing a powder-blue sweater in court, Leaned Back in His Chair Around This Point of the Proceeding to Stretch. “Juror No. 6 is Excused.” The Wayward Panelist was replaced with an alternate juror who is White. While no. 6 is gone, there might be more jury drama. The Court is ascing another juror to stay after testimony wraps this afternion, to address some sort of Potential Issue.