Delhi News: Why did the Supreme Court reprimand Delhi and the police? This is the whole thing - the Supreme Court is hitting and the police in Delhi in the death of the car

The Delhi High Court reprimanded police and police in Delhi. For when finding the body of a young man in Noida, both did not register a fir and still blamed them. The court said that important evidence could disappear. The court ordered police in Delhi to register a zero of murder and surrender the evidence to UP police. The body in the car reprimanded Up-Delhi police. Lying Photo Jagran Correspondent, New -Delhi. The Delhi High Court has reprimanded police in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh (UP) police that they blamed each other after a person from Delhi was found dead in Noida and did not register a fir. Judge Anoop Jairam Bhambhani expressed serious concern about the incident in the case, saying that two different police forces did not understand that important forensic and other evidence would disappear forever if they were not collected immediately. The court said he clearly understood that the current case was an example of the syndrome to blame each other between the police in Delhi and the police. The court ordered police in Delhi to register zero’s under section 103 (murder) and other related divisions of the Indian Justice Code (BNS) and transfer all the content and evidence that the East collected through the East within a week. The court ruling came at the request of the sister’s sister, who demanded an investigation after the death of his 20 -year -old brother Harsh Kumar Sharma. The deceased brother left a college in Noida to his home in Delhi on December 3, 2024, but he was found dead in his car in an unknown place in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, the car has a carbon monoxide cylinder. The court said adequate material was available at UP police to register a FIR directly for the crime of murder. Delhi police said they had no complaint that the death of the victim was the result of any disorder and no crime under his jurisdiction, so there was no reason to register a fir. On the other hand, UP police argued that in cases of suspected death, the law ordered an investigation action under section 194 of the Indian Civil Protection Code (BNSS). Police said death is suspected and that a post -mortem was done in a government hospital and that an investigation proceedings were started before an executive magistrate, which pending that it could not be assumed that the death of the proponent was a case. Every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.