The prosecutor of Hasto's prosecutor of the fortress fortress asked KPK investigators about my bribery case

Jakarta -Hasto Kristiyanto, secretary of the PDIP of PDIP, protested the question of the prosecutor to KPK investigators related to the exposure of the results of the team analysis in my bribery case. The Hasto camp questions the relevance of the question of the investigation case that benefited his client. KPK investigator Arif Budi Raharjo was presented as a witness at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Friday (5/16/2025). Initially, Arif explained about the exposure of the bribery case of my Masal Maspin according to the question of the KPK prosecutor. Hasto’s lawyer, Alvon Kurnia Palma, interrupted Arif’s answer. Alvon protested due to the agreement at the beginning of the hearing, on January 8, 2020, the alleged pioneers of the investigation into the Catching Hands (OTT) were investigated. Browse to continue the content “Talk about the meeting, the agreement is related to the 8th,” Alvon argued. “Yes, it’s still about the process, his majesty,” the prosecutor said. Alvon questions the relevance of the question. He asked the KPK prosecutor to focus on the question of the January 8, 2020 incident. “Is it there? No, that’s the team. That’s it. Well, it has become an assumption, right? Well, please focus on the 8th. It’s all, the meeting. Thanks,” Alfons continued. The prosecutor said the question was a series of events of January 8, 2020. The prosecutor said Arif is a witness to the fact that the exposure and arrest process has become the basis for analyzing the exposure of the exposure to bribery cases at the time. “The noble permit, this is only a series, a series of 8 then made an exposure, and it explains the total results in the exposure,” the prosecutor said. Check out more on the next page. The prosecutor said Arif did not see firsthand, but was the overall result of the team in the investigation process. Alvon returned to protest and wanted the prosecutor’s demand to focus on the investigation. “Sorry, but the agreement is on the 8th. That’s all. It is actually a fact gestures? ” says Alvon. The prosecutor also said that his question still has a correlation with events or facts. The prosecutor said Arif Budi Rahotutur was in the development of this case. “The facts associated with the exposure process, the arrest process, joined everyone, the facts, and then asked in the hearing, it was not us. Therefore, I was emphasized, not to see firsthand, but he was the result of the total team in the investigation process earlier, so that it made the conclusions by the team. “Sorry, the meeting we mean so agreed that it is a factual witness. It is one. Secondly, it is related to the agreement on the 8th, the relationship with OOJ (Baconation of Justice) Yes. Now it is included in another room,” Tangapalvon. Chief Justice of Judges Rios Rahmanto then mediates. Rios later asked Hasto’s legal team to give his own answer to the relevance of Arif’s statement. “Similarly, just respond to the question of whether this witness he experienced, he himself saw, and we will later judge the relevance of what is experienced, seen and experienced by yourself. The judge said that Arif invited the process of exposed results related to the analysis of the bribery. The prosecutor continued to continue the evidence. Just arrest, but it tells of the process of the span analysis, “the judge said.” With the suspicious Harun Masiku. Make Harun my mass is still a refugee from the KPK. have been charged with Hasto for bribing with his reliable people, Donny Tri Istiqomah and Saful Bahri, also gave Masu Masiku.