“The Blue Mark” and a fame on Tek Tok .. What did the court say about Mona Farouk?

Today, Thursday, the Economic Court in Cairo deposited the reasons for imprisoning the artist Mona Farouk, 3 years with work and guaranteeing 10 thousand pounds to stop the execution of the penalty of imprisonment temporarily and fined her an amount of 100 thousand pounds and obligated her to criminal expenses in accusing her of encroaching on the values ​​of the Egyptian family.

The reasons for the ruling of the imprisonment of Mona Farouk, which Al -Masry Al -Youm obtained a copy of it: “I also attach a data printer from the Civil Status Authority, fixed by that the accused is called Mona Mohamed Farouk Hassan and bears a national number (…), and it was also proven from the court’s reading of the account of the account called“ mona.farouk@ “on the social networking site” Lake Luke “showing that he has a blue mark with what is documented in the name of The account holder, and it was found that he was written by the following data (Mona Farouk 25 Egyptian actresses with advertisements), and where the Public Prosecution submitted the papers to the criminal trial and the papers were presented to the court after the announcement of the accused to attend in accordance with the correct law, and the misdemeanor circulated in the sessions in the form of its lecturer and at the session of 20/125/12, such as the author of the communication with his person and he was called Medalia in the amount of five hundred thousand pounds as a way of civil compensation The temporary did not represent the accused or an agent of it- despite declaring a law- and the court decided to seize the lawsuit to issue the ruling at the January 29 session.

Al -Hathiyyat added: “As the court paves the way for its judiciary with what is decided by a law in the text of Article 238 of the Criminal Procedure Law that“ if the opponent in charge of attendance does not attend according to the law on the day shown in the assignment paper to attend, and he has not been sent an agent for him in the cases in which Jesus this may be judged in his absence after reviewing the papers, unless the assignment paper to the attendance was delivered to his person and the court shows that there is no justification for his lack of attendance The ruling is in the presence, and since the constant of the papers to the court was that the accused announced a law and was not attended, and then the ruling is absent in its confrontation with the text of Article 238 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Ignoring family values ​​leads Mona Farouk to imprisonment

The court continued: “As it is on the subject of misdemeanor, and since the text of Article 25 of Law No. 175 of the year 18 regarding combating information technology crimes is that he was punished with imprisonment for a period of no less than six months, and a fine of not less than fifty thousand pounds and not exceeding one hundred thousand pounds, or with one of these two penalties who assaulted any of the principles or family values ​​in Egyptian society or violating the sanctity of private life, or sent with many density One of the electronic messages of a specific person without his consent, or granting personal data to a system or website to promote goods or services without his consent, or published through the information network or one of the means of information technology information, news or pictures and the like: violates the privacy of any person without his consent, whether the information published is correct or incorrect ».

Al -Iqtisadiya continued, in the reasons for the ruling of imprisonment of Mona Farouk: “It was stable to eliminate that what was that, and it was decided that the criminal intent in the crime of attacking the principles and family values ​​of the Egyptian society from the objective issues related to the facts of the case in which the trial court is separated in light of the circumstances presented to it, and it is not necessary for the judgment to speak explicitly and the independence of what is as long In its blogs, all the legal elements of that crime that the appellant condemned have, because what arouses it in this regard is nothing more than an objective controversy in the court’s appreciation of the evidence of the case and its authority in the weight of its elements and the deduction of its belief, which may not be raised before the Court of Cassation ».

Text of the reasons for imprisoning Mona Farouk 3 years

According to the reasons for the ruling of the young artist’s imprisonment: “Also, the one who settled on it is that, and when the indication of the text of the article is not stipulating the crime or moving the criminal lawsuit before the defendants submit a complaint or a communication, and it is sufficient for it to be available in the act that the defendants have been exhausted, which constitutes an attack on the principles or family values ​​in Egyptian society, and when the constant of the court from its reading of all the papers of the law The actions committed by the two defendants are legally painful crimes and were not satisfied with committing them, but they photographed them and built them on the social networking site (Tek Tok) to see the crowds of citizens, striking the wall with the values ​​of society and its laws, which are nurtured from these shameful acts.

The court concluded: «It is decided that the basic principle in criminal trials is the conviction of the judge based on the evidence presented to him, so he may be a colonel from any evidence or presumption that is comfortable with it unless the law was restricted by a specific evidence that stipulates it, and the criminal law did not make to prove the crime of attacking the principles and family values ​​in Egyptian society a special path, and it was not required that the evidence that the judgment relied on so that every evidence of it was said and cut in each part of the parts The lawsuit, as the evidence in the criminal articles is in support of each other, and including combined, the court’s doctrine is formed, so a specific evidence is not seen for discussing it separately without the rest of the evidence, but it is sufficient that the evidence in its entirety be as a unit leading to what he intended to judge and produced in completing the opening of the court and reassuring it to what it ended- as is the case in the case.