Attorney -General's corruption Corruption Corruption Corruption claims corruption of the Tangerang Sea Fence case

Jakarta – The Attorney’s Office (ago) said there were indications of corruption in the case of Se fences in Tangerang Waters. The Attorney General’s Office then suggested that the national corruption corruption eradication investigates Cortas Corps. It was transferred by the director of a jampidum ago, Nanang Ibrahim Soleh, after returning the case of the Tangerang Sea Fence case to the investigator for the police in criminal investigations. “That our instructions that the case is a case of corruption. Because it involves bribery, there is also a forgery, there is also all the abuse of authority,” Nanang Wednesday (4/16/2025) said at the office of the Attorney General, South Jakarta. Browse to continue with content “, in accordance with section 25 of the Act 31/99, if the case, from many cases that take precedence, is a case that is especially the specialist Lex, is a matter of corruption crime,” he continued. According to Nanang, dealing with the case is based on the principle of Lex Specialis.lex Specialis Derogat Legi General Daha is the principle of law that says that the law that is special (Lex specialist) exceeds the general law (Lex generalis). “The point is, therefore, that we are returned to the corruption corps (corps of eradicating corruption crimes of the National Police). Furthermore, he said that the matter of forgery of documents and criminal acts of corruption should be jointly investigated, perhaps not separately. Well, if it’s more, I said that Lex is the specialist. On the same occasion, the head of the research team of the office of the Jampidum Attorney General Sunarwan explained the reason why the case entered the alleged corruption. Because there is a change in ownership status. “According to our assessment, there are (element of corruption), because there are facts supported by evidence of the existence of the sea, which then turns its status into individual property and then belongs to the company,” Sunarwan explained. “So that the state ownership of the sea is released. That’s our point, why do we say that there is an act against the law, the status changes,” he explained. In addition, Sunarwan also explained that there were allegations of abuse of authority by state administrators in the Sea Fence Case in Tangerang Waters. Authority of authority is carried out from the village level. “Who is the state organization. Since the level of the village head after the process of issuing the SHGB. There are actions and everything performed by the state organizers. So that here by state administrators,” says Sunarwan. He also emphasized that the Tangerang Sea Fence case was a criminal act of corruption. “That’s why we convey that our instructions are a case of corruption,” he added. As far as the state’s losses are concerned, Sunarwan said there was no statement from the Supreme Audit Agency (Ltd) regarding the loss of state losses. However, there are experts who suspect there are state losses. “So it is not in the case file that Witnesses from the Ltd, from where is not there. But there are experts, but not experts on corruption,” Sunarwan said. Previously, Dirtypidum Barekrim Polri, Brigadier General Djuhandhani Rardjo Puro, said his party had completed the case file of the case of a sea fence in the waters of Tangerang. “We remain especially from the national police investigator to see that the criminal offense as referred to in the formulation of Article 263 of the penal code. According to the investigators, the files we sent were formally and materially fulfilled,” Djuandhani said on Thursday (10/4/2025). He said based on the results of investigating knowledgeable witnesses, including the Supreme Audit Agency (Ltd), for the development of the case of SHGB and SHM documents in the Tangerang Sea Pagar area, there was no indication of state losses. (Ond/Zap) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here