WAQF LAW 2025: IMPORTANT HEARING ABOUT WAQF Act in the Supreme Court today, petition demanding the cancellation of the Act -important trial on the WAQF law in the Supreme Court today

The WAQF Amendment Act will hold a significant trial in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Three -member bank of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan will hear the petitions. More than 20 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court in which the Legislation of the WAQF Amendment Act was disputed. In addition, most petitions are against the law. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The WAQF Amendment Act will hold a significant trial in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Three -member bank of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan will hear the petitions. The challenge of the WAQF Amendment Act-2025 legislation has filed more than 20 petitions in the Supreme Court, which contested the Legislation of the WAQF Amendment Act 2025. Most of the petitions are against the law, although some petitions also support the law. There are two petitions demanding the WAQF Basic Law Waqf Act 1995 to be canceled. The trial held on Wednesday is considered important, as some petitions have also been demanded to impose an interim ban on the WAQF amendment Act 2025, but the central government has also filed a cavity in the Supreme Court, so that the Supreme Court does not take any interim order by unilateral hearing. The court also heard his side before transferring any order. This is one of those who disputed the legalism of the WAQF Act in the Supreme Court. Among those who disputed the law of the WAQF Act in the Supreme Court, All India Majlisse Etyahadul Muslimen (Aimam) chief Asaduddin Owaisi, Parliamentary member Mohammad Javed, Congress Member Imran Pratapgadh, Jeevayat Ulama a Hind, Arshad Madani, Arshad Madani, all India Muslim Purchase of civil rights. Apart from this, RJD MP Manoj Jha, DMK -LP A. Raja, All Kerala Jamiatul Ulama, Social Democratic Party of India, Indian Muslim League, Anjum Qadri, Tayyab Khan, APCR (CIVL Rights Protection Association), Trinamool Congress Mahua Moitra, Aam Petition -Aam Petition – From the Aami -Party Party, Aaami -Party Party -Party, Fiad, Aami -Purple lies in it. Claimed. These states supported the WAQF Act, while the governments of seven states of Rajasthan, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Uttarakhand, Maharashtra and CHhattisGarh supported the Waqf Amendment Act by filing an intervention application in the Supreme Court. In addition, some petitions have also been submitted in which the basic law of WAQF is attempted to cancel. Harishankar Supreme Court Advocate Jain said that Supreme Court lawyer Harishankar Jain and Parul Kheda, who came from Uttar Pradesh, filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding that the WAQF law 1995 be discriminated against Hindus and not -Moslims. Both of these petitions also demanded that the courts state that orders, instructions or notices issued under the WAQF Act will not apply to the property of Hindus and not -Muslims. The claim for the abolition of the WAQF Amendment Act 2025 was asked to cancel the entertainment of the new amended law in the petitions that dispute the WAQF Amendment Act 2025. These petitions say that the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 violates the right to equal and the right to religious freedom. The petitions also opposed the proceeds not to include -muslims in the Central Waqf Parishad and State Waqf directions. Read-SC will also be heard on this day against WAQF Law, the central government has also made this claim, every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app