Technology will accelerate the rate of change in 2025

The acceleration of change is the most striking that any author of opinion articles can do. Its acceleration has been shown in terms of wars in the past few years, conflicts around the world and politics in the United States, and in the impressive progress in the field of artificial intelligence. I expect this change to continue during 2025, especially with regard to the technical part. It is likely that the progress in the field of artificial intelligence continues, and that includes general artificial intelligence, but it has not yet been the extent of the influence it will happen, but I recently wondered: “What as the general artificial intelligence developed, and no one came into it?” By the end of 2025, which wastes artificial intelligence, it will become clear to most intellectual observers that the elite of artificial intelligence models can exceed most experts in knowledge tests. I do not doubt that artificial intelligence will overcome me in a test dealing with the economy. Indeed, artificial intelligence will exceed experts in their field of experience, as doctors have started diagnosing medical conditions. But the biggest surprise is the small effect of this, at least in the first phase. Unfortunately, our society is not regularly in a way to make the way it can utilize clever progress in the field of artificial intelligence, even if it is available at low prices, as this new intelligence will clash with pure human systems with its rules, restrictions and need for consent. Matt Clifford expressed this by saying, “There is no space available for artificial intelligence in most institutions.” The use of artificial intelligence will therefore spread, and we will use it as a psychotherapist or its owner without restrictions. It will only be a practical start that can take decades to rebuild institutions in relation to a better use of artificial intelligence. At the end of 2025, more votes will be exaggerated by frustration due to the lack of real progress in making artificial intelligence systems broader and effective. Medical progress is the only exception I mentioned in the beginning, and I mean the healthcare sector. The general question of whether crackling over the United States’ healthcare system is related to the awarding of a large percentage of our local product. But in 2025 we will begin to wonder why more resources are not allocated to this sector, and over time we will increase spending, especially if artificial intelligence can discover new medicine. Despite the extremely popular dissatisfaction, the healthcare sector in the United States will continue to improve its performance compared to the rest of the world. On the other hand, the expansion of waiting periods and the decline in investments in countries such as Canada and the UK will reduce the attractiveness of comprehensive monochrome healthcare systems. In America, the deaths caused by excessive doses will decrease, and obesity will decrease thanks to the optimal similar peptide-1 medicine. Parallel progress will continue to fight cancer. Regarding the technology and relationship with the economy and money, the stable currencies will continue to grow in payment systems in the United States and abroad, as institutions are increasingly interested in entering into the transactions associated with the dollar. Although the Federal Reserve may worry about developing the financial system beyond its control, the Male Trump administration in the curriculum of coded currencies will win with this innovation, and the dollar will gain more power than a reserve currency. On a larger scale, I expect a continuation of the poor labor markets, but it seems that the US economy has enough momentum to prevent them from entering a recession. Confused views on another level will emphasize a technical problem that is indirectly related to the economy, which is an increase in interest in unknown phenomena in the airspace. This has caused several views of aircraft on New Jersey and other states of the public’s imagination and the attention of politicians. In this context, the elected president promised a higher transparent level on the activities and movements of the federal government. It is easy to expect Trump not to commit to his promise, because transparency is easy if someone else carries its consequences. But his appointment in many personalities from outside the system does not exclude the appearance of more leaks or less political tweet outside the swarm. This means increasing strange allegations about unknown views in the atmosphere, making it difficult to determine what should be believed. There are many other questions that exist on important geopolitical issues, such as the plight of many wars around the world, or the ability of Chinese and European economies to restart, and whether it will prove that the phenomenon of political assassinations will become infected. The only overseer in this regard is what I mentioned: We have a lot of anticipation in 2025.