In the Civil Court on the claim of a Shiva Temple in Ajmer Dargah, what is the whole thing in the video

An important hearing was held on Saturday in the Civil Court of Ajmer, in which the petition filed by Vishnu Gupta was discussed by the allegation that he is a Shiva temple in the premises of Ajmer Dargah. The petition claims that a Shiva Temple is located in Ajmer Dargah premises, and it must be properly recognized. Details of the trial: Two separate applications were presented in this case: The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), on behalf of the Minority Department, both parties presented their arguments on behalf of the minority department in court. During the hearing, it was notified that the notice was issued by Vishnu Gupta without making the government a party and without following the appropriate process, which is not legally correct. The court said this process should have been followed. What is the matter? The case has been in the news since a person named Vishnu Gupta claimed the existence of a Shiva temple in the Ajmer Dargah premises and filed a petition on the right. He says there was an ancient Shiva temple in this complex, which was included in the structure of the Dargah of the Muslim community. According to Vishnu Gupta, this temple must be restored in the original form. Protests on this have been expressed by minority community and other religious organizations, as the Dargah has historical and religious importance. Court Roll: The Court reviews the legal process in this case. The court will ensure whether the petition has a reasonableness of the claim and whether the administrative rules and procedure have been followed. The court sought more arguments from both sides on the issue and took a step to give appropriate orders on the issue. The matter can take a major transfers over religious disputes and the right to the historical field, as the Ajmer Dargah is an important religious place for the Indian Muslim community and any decision on it can have a broader religious and cultural impact. Further hearing: The court determined the date for further hearing in this case and said he should give appropriate orders after listening to the case carefully. Share this story -tags