This ago, an appeal for the voting of the defendant submitted corporate corruption migor

Jakarta – The Attorney’s Office (ago) office has filed an appeal on the judgment of the discharge or a freelance decision against the defendant Corporate Corporation of Cooking Oil. The cache was presented on March 27, 2025. “Already (submission of cache) from March 27, 2025 according to the request of the couch,” Harli Siregar, attorney -general of Kapus -Penkum, told reporters Tuesday (15 // 4/2025). The corporate defendants sentenced to loose decisions were PT Wilmar Group, Permata Hijau Group and the MAS group season. Browse to continue with the content of the Supreme Court (MA), also said he would oversee the appeal of the AGO. The Supreme Court also said the case of this freelance decision was not binding for permanent legal power. “The decision of the Corruption Court at the Central Jakarta District Court was not yet a permanent legal power, because on March 27, 2025, the public prosecutor presented a remedy,” Yanto said at a press conference at the Supreme Court office, South Jakarta, on Monday (3/14), Yanto said that his party is currently awaiting the completeness of Jakarta Corruption Court. Yanto ensured that the Supreme Court would later revise the case at the cache level. “After the cashier file is completed, the Central Jakarta District Court will immediately send an appeal file electronically to the Supreme Court,” Yanto said. It is known, three corporate defendants were sentenced to the panel of judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court. Investigating a calibaration, it appears that there is a suspicion of bribes behind the defendant’s corporation. The Ago officially arrested the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court (PN), Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, in the alleged bribery case of the discharge ruling or a loose decision on the crude palm (CPO) execution of corruption or the raw material for cooking oil (fried). Ago revealed that Arif allegedly received RP 60 billion in this case. In addition, there were 3 judges and young clerks at the North Jakarta District Court and advocates who were also nominated as suspects in this case. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. The three allegedly received a bribe worth RP 22.5 billion for the freelance sentence. The three judges, along with Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, compiled as chair of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; As well as the young registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. Cases of bribery and satisfaction are related to the judgment of the discharge or freelance decision on the matter of corruption in the export of raw materials for cooking oil. At the time, the panel of judges gave a loose decision to the corporate defendant. (ZAP/DHN) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here